The Ploughmans lunch or The Ploughboys Lunch

The Ploughmans Lunch myth

The ‘ploughmans lunch’ was as a cohesive peice of faux history popularised by the ‘milk marketing board’ to increase cheese sales in the 1960’s, and highlighted to publicans the Idea of serving a marketed plate of food at lunchtimes, hitherto a haphazardly catered for need, which thankfully to some extent can be thought responsible for kicking off the whole ‘pub food revolution’. Prior to this pubs might well have been able, if they could be troubled to, knock you up the odd cheese sandwich, and would often have the odd jar of pickled eggs or onions and sometimes some cold meats or pies on offer, but these snacks in most pubs in the 1930’s were a token gesture towards serving food, to sustain workmen who might otherwise not get a proper meal, but in these days ‘Beer’ was by labourers considered as important as food, and to some extent drink was also perceived as sustaining in a way than it is not today, Beer in itself being high in calories. Really the Ploughmans Lunch was a formalising and coalescing of the cold food ingredients that might well have already been in a pubs serving vocabulary, into a named plate of food that could be served like a meal to the patrons of the public house in a marketable way, which up until this point food in a pub had been a casual arrangement whose extent and quality was at the publicans discretion, In a way things were charmingly relaxed as in there was no formalisation of food being served, but if you had voiced your requirement of vittels to the publican, he would often have something to offer, sometimes even what he himself would be having for supper if you were lucky, but what it was and how it came, was most often pot luck, rarely would people think to the need of a choice, nor complain as to what was offered. A ploughmans was the first widely marketed meal in a pub, when done well is surprisingly satisfying – even today. Remember during war all such pre war pub food culture that did exist had been firmly limited for the duration of the war, and its recommencement was probably slow and limited due to extended rationing, to some extent the “ploughmans” was an attempt to formalise those bits that remained and increase cheese sales.

Traditionally consisting of :

Initially a cold dish of Hunks of Cheese or sliced Cold meats or if luxurient both, always accompanied by Hunks of bread or long rustic rolls with pats of butter and essentially pickles most often a spreading style pickle, or a couple of pickled onions or both, and latterly token salad elements – sliced tomatoes, lettuce possibly a cold boiled egg and very often apple slices etc. but can also include pork pie, grapes, celery, carrot, pâté, hard boiled egg, beetroot etc, but to be honest these as referenced to the ingredients pubs had at hand throughout the country before the formalistion of the title by the MMB, a ploughmans could vary quite a bit the main things that remained the core of the dish, were the bread the cheese and the pickle in some form or another whether onion or chutney or both, most important is the rustic nature of the dish that means that most of the items served in a ploughmans must be with little fuss or short preparation in the dish itself as there was often little time in between serving customers to allow its preparation. The ‘ploughmans lunch’ in its pre war unformalised era might have been called the “The ploughboys lunch”. But the marvelous thing about a ploughmans is how they vary depending on where you are, it enables each pub to put its own twist on the idea, but with a central trinity that remains. In the case of informal history there is no doubt in my imagination that field labourers, ploughman etc throughout the century’s could call when convenient on a nearby hostelry or ale house and get some form of food provided, this is quite obviously logical especially with a mainly male and sometimes migratory field labour force, its just that no one ever thought to formalise the process, as the original purpose was as a ‘house of ale’, this its primary function and food secondary and available but less documented or considered in the equation, certainly so, in small country village pubs where the ploughmans was to find it’s birth.

Basically the contents of a couple large hearty sandwiches unmade. This being very simple for publicans to knock up with little need for a cook etc. In the 1970’s pubs which had never really served food in a formal sense, soon started by offering simple cold plates like this and then progressed to deep fried food in baskets and then increasingly complex menus, and onward into a situation in which very few pubs indeed, now … could get away without serving food of some sort that requires a chef or a cook to prepare.

Essentialy in the 1970’s allot of people were marketed into imagining this was a dish traditionally made for a ‘ploughman’, though its heritage is foggier than the marketed dishes name, from a pub serving perspective, also the meal served in the field to labourers mid day may well have consisted of these elements in a homemade rustic picnic form.

If you come across an old pub with a run down interior and lots of local characters, sometimes they may still only offer a cheese sandwich or pickles, and this is remnant perhaps of a pub that has never got fully drawn into the food provision game, this might might well be an original survivor pub, whose mainly drinking custom has always and until the modern day been enough to sustain it, these pubs are very rare today. Sadly a very large number of historic pubs have been ruined by modernisation and the ubiquitous and obscenely appended Thai restaurant. Pubs really have to offer food now as the consistency of post work drinking patterns and the family mealtime has to some extent evaporated, and this pub provision of food, has probably had its greatest impact on late opening simple cafes surviving in the smaller towns and larger villages, though expendable income to be spent on eating out since the 1930’s versus eating at home has greatly increased. And Pubs that don’t serve food may find it difficult to draw enough passing trade.

SSPCA dictates invasive species protected ?

RSPCA dictates invasive species protected ?

you want rid of your peacocks ? just hire someone to come and shoot the lot and eat them, ignore the SSPCA, how dare they state that invasive species are protected in this country to roam and breed unchecked ? and these ones arent living in the wild theyre surviving in an urban environnment by raiding veg gardens and probably bins ? I should imagine if they get the chance.

If the village is ‘pretend complaining for publicity’ then fine ignore them, but if they genuinely and democratically decide they dont want the peacocks or wish to cull them then they should have a right democratically to make that decision and deal with them, as long as the meat is eaten.

Britain effectively ceased to exist as a soverieign entity on the 10th Dec 1991

Britain effectively ceased to exist as a sovereign entity on the 10th Dec 1991, with the signing of the Maastricht treaty, do not delude yourself otherwise, no country which cannot control which persons can enter its borders has control of their own country or any real sense of self determination. Britain was only great when is was sure of its own identity, and was culturally unified in purpose. Our overpopulated isle and your future native progeny are now fully exposed to competition with 800 million people, whose cultures maybe more agressive selfish and less civilised than your own.

This is disregarding the impact of the era of global mass immigration external to the EU into the UK over the last 40 years we have been living under the kosh of, that has compounded the struggling native englishmans situation further.

the unemployed’s viewpoint

Dear Ben Gilet

Bullshit – if theyre arent any jobs, start a business don’t expect a job to be handed to you, stop playing computer games and get of your arse. Whose paying for your flat mate ? on housing benefit are we ? your not getting £135 every two weeks if that’s the case are you ? your getting a great deal more? no jobs in your area ? ever heard of moving ? starting a business ?

not feeling great ? perhaps you should stop living inside and playing computer games for an existence ?

tough love is what you need

Waltham fighting the CPZ

residents in waltham fight CPZ – go for it guys

CPZ’s are a stealth tax which get implemented by pushing the commuter parking to new areas by moving the CPZ boundary, its a one way ratchet conversion as the CPZ reaches the fringe of your area the uncontrolled boundary area becomes a hot zone for commuter parking, enabling the council to expand the CPZ into your area, once your paying £25.00 – £101.00 a year it will just become another form of profitable taxation that vicariously allows the council to import and employ more foreign born african traffic wardens for no good reason, and over the years the council will increase the cost of it until in 5 years time, your paying an extra £250.00 a year to park outside your own house on top of Council Tax, the thing is a horror. Also none of your guests will ever be able to freely park or visit you without you or them paying for the privilege think about agreeing to CPZ’s very carefully.

They’re just stealth Taxation and more unneccessary cost and bureaucracy, and the bureaucracy in this country is currently too large, councils only know how to increase the cost to you the consumer of their services, they’re are a gaping waste of money, since they never manage to shrink they’re budgets as well as expand them. But then ridiculous rules on social housing don’t help the cost control for councils.

The situation before CPZ’s were invented was not worse, it just pushes the problem around, if theyre were no CPZ’s it would alleviate the focused stress points of commuter parking and distribute them better, after all people arent going to stop commuting by car to london and parking because of this, theyll just park further out, or waste more energy and productive time driving further to find a place to park, reducing productive economic activity Large underground cheap car parks would be a better solution.

Quantative Easing >

Quantative Easing > ie printing money, devaluing the currency and stealing from every saver in the country to prop up an economy mainly based on artificial house price gains, and enable a bankrupt government to keep on borrowing at our expense, compounding the situation further if only these idiots could understand they cant keep creating debts on our behalf theyre gambling that future generations will somehow be able to pay back.

over the last 3 years if you had any money saved then the house owning debt laden class of this culture have stolen from you the saver, the money necessary to keep the charade of this house price based economy afloat by forcefully, diminishing the value of your savings by 25% so as to save the artificial gains they have on their property, and enable a government to keep on spending even though were not going to be able to payback the debt they keep creating.

UK Foreign Origin Benefits Claimants

371,000 foreign nationals when entering britain, now residing in britain are claiming benefits

371,000 x £26,000 per annum = 9.646 billion pounds ? per annum

These figures in now way account for the children born here from these immigrants claiming off the benefit system ?

BBC ID website comments feature worthless : “A false sense of democracy”

OK I bothered to waste the time to create a BBC ID login, and add a comment to one of the “FEW” articles that are available to comment on the BBC corporation push based media website( ie its nominally interactive )

The article got up to 738 comments and they locked it from anymore comments.

The comment system on the BBC website is token and pointless and here are the reasons why :

1: every comment is censored by a paid human being for political correctness and language, (A total profligate waste of license money) since the comments after this process can never be said to represent free opinion, or allow for any negativity or criticism toward the beeb, it is automatically a pointless system !

In contrast to a ‘were all adults’ approach ie a completely free self moderated system.(all they need is a disclaimer of liability ?) after all if idiots want to chase theyre tail getting upset by comments on a website allow them to, but at least they’ll get a realistic view of the full spectra of opinion of the public ? whereas as the beebs approach has always been to sanitise public opinion to some absurd politically correct fascist liberal agenda > which is in no way democratic.

2: Very few articles Continue reading

No she not a spy, shes alledgedly just “immature, calculating, emotional and self-centred young woman” according to the trial. classic …

Katia Zatuliveter age … 26

aide ? to

Mike Hancock MP age … 65

according to the telegraph :

“Katia Zatuliveter, 26, had affairs with Mike Hancock, a member of the defence select committee, and with a Dutch diplomat, a German Nato official and a UN worker.”

hmm that’s one way to stay in the country sleep with a 65 year old politician . . . . and a whole collection of older powerful burocrats.

“Miss Zatuliveter, who is being represented by a media handler and is expected to sign an exclusive deal to sell her story, said: “I feel fine. I am very happy, incredible relief. My parents are ecstatic.”

yes im sure they are ecstatic about who theyre daughter has been sleeping with ? all quotes referenced from these two articles :

Read more:
and here

wow shes such a moral human being ? Katia It’s so grim having to climb that greasy corrupt morally bankrupt political pole, but I guess your prepared to.

she said of the older men >

“She also appreciated their “humour, sophistication and kindliness,” the panel said. A personal diary included “excruciating detail” about her attempts to ensnare men and revealed she was an “immature, calculating, emotional and self-centred young woman”.”

the truth will out …

Great another useless contribution to the people that we allow to stay resident in this overly liberal culture.

MP Hancock – you sir are a truly predictable 65 year old man > GROW UP > and stop having women 39 years your junior who work for you ? and concentrate on the job at hand that portsmouth needs you to get on with !

“They said Mike Hancock, the Lib Dem MP for Portsmouth South, who appeared to mix with glamorous Russian and Ukrainian women and was supportive of the Russian government “would have been of long-standing interest to one or more Russian intelligence agencies.”
This liberal certainly does like immigration, especially when it get him access to young female russian ones to play around with, Mike . . . . christ you make politics look grimey. hopegully you can climb back into obscurity.

Christ and my day has been disturbed by the furtive goings on between a 65 year old liberal idiot and a needy for fathering insecure political sugardaddy pole climber, god why do I now feel the need to vomit and a general hatred for the continuingly corrupted behaviour of the 60’s generation ?

Her sister and brother-in-law, with whom she lived in Bradford, did not accept her relationship with Mr Hancock but the panel said: “However odd it might seem, she fell for him.”

“Miss Zatuliveter said afterwards that she was “very happy” with the decision and her parents were “ecstatic.” Her tearful sister, Polina, who lives in Chorley, Lancashire, rushed from the court room to ring them when the judgment came through.”

and Polina her sister of course magically by chance just happens as well to be living in the good old UK, because the UK border is effectively non existent ! and half run by naturalised immigrants allot of the time ? bloody bullshit this country is degenerating into, and this story evidence of it.

Ed milliband Vocal butt trumpet for the unions F him

I might hate the cameron government for its weak and inneffectual inability to cut immigration figures, but on this front hes right, the public sector pension figures for payments in and out have to add up and make fiscal sense, the difference cannot be subbed up and exploited from poorer recompensed private sector workers.

Public Sector Workers should try it in the private sector for a year, they’d soon realise they’ve often got it easy in contrast to most poor private sector workers, self employed, I’m self employed I earn under £16,000 a year and will no doubt end up on the state pension, The idea these public sector workers with their nice comfy pensions want to preserve their pot, and arent prepared to pay for the actual cost of providing the value in their own pensions, the poor private sector taxpayer with rubbish or no pensions can’t sub up these people anymore, the pubic sector seems riddled with self entitled balding union men, feminist women and immigrants all bonded together by the magical solidarity of the desire of money from the taxpayer. And allot of these public sector workers are employed to serve another group of people who live under a false umbrella of self entitlement the benefits system. Theres a building with solar panels near me called a “refugee therapy centre” ? No public money should have been or ever should be wasted on this kind of rubbish. The only valid point the public sector workers have is the the bankers have not yet been made to learn any lesson, they are still to be dealt with. If anyone was to be taxed it should be the bankers, but lets be honest if you let the unions get their selfish way they can wreck an economy > I lived in the seventies I remember. You cant expect to be given, what you aren’t paying for, simple logic.

Some public sector workers get three years severance pay ? at the taxpayers expense ? wtf I get 0 severance pay in my line of work, you just go out and find new work …

“The workers united will never be defeated” ? that kind of crap is only valid in a culture that lives by economic sense and and has the spare / slush capital to pay for such bullshit sloganistic diatribe spouted by the ignorant, public sector workers have never generated the taxes necessary to pay their own wages, that responsibility comes down to the private sector.

Decent men and women day in day out … being attacked ? emotive and unproveable language ? decent how would anyone know ? attacked ? attacked plain emotive, an insistance that you pay in enough money, to pay for your own pension draw at the end its simple money logic.

Pensions over the last 20 years have always worked on the wrong assumption re working population doubling, pensions are not a pyramid scheme, you need to pay a measure proportionate to the money youd eventually like to take out, money doesn’t just magic out of anywhere. revisions to the compensation offered in peoples pensions is dependent on economy and markets just like anything else. Which currently are in the tank and will remain so for some time.