Is this photo now the definition of
the blind leading the blind
how idiots can actually be dangerous
how the arrogant can be dangerous
how the self agrandising transmission of ones own egotistical unfounded mystically self divined interpretations of a fictional ‘chinese whispered’ over corrupted text from an adulterated compilation story book from 2000 years ago can be dangerous.
or perhaps just how geriatric religious nuts opinions should be ignored
strange thing is this guy is most majorly just a con artist and should be in prison, but your sweet old grey haired harmless old man appearance is a skin over the top of le ego grande, your half rotted corpse of an existence, after all camping doesn’t have long to go anyway before he “doesnt” meet the big jeezus and his daddy goddikins, which judge will stomach locking him up ? sick thing is this fucker has got form and did this once before in 1994, he should have been locked up then.
also if hes truly religious how did he manage to clusterfuck his own kind, so successfully by ruining their lives with his taking of their money for silly purposes, and then in that truly christian sense ? deny all responsibility ? pity he doesnt take the word of the bible seriously, as it says false prophets are to be killed. Truthfully harold if you had faith in GOD you can ‘commit’ your own personally actioned rapture and go ahead of us all to see if god is waiting for you, as a man of faith this carnal existence must mean little to you ? or are you scared or does your lack of faith prevent you from going to heaven what 4-5 years early ? after all there must be no god if liers such as yourself go on for another 10 years talking more rubbish. But i guess your failed 1994 prediction led you to this inevitable 2nd failing rather than a second coming end of the world whatever, primarily because you have such a massive self investment and EGO in your first wrong prediction you could not allow yourself to imagine your actually just an idiot whose wasted his life reading a false book and thereby making false predictions about outcomes of future events from it, I suggest you read better source material, then things you say might not be guarantee-ably wrong.

I think Harold your real problems must stem in a freudian way, from an overindulged childhood in which unwarranted amounts of love and expectation were placed upon you, and your deep belief in the propaganda your parents must have projected, of absolute and unquestioning love and unfounded faith in you, which you proceeded over years to believe yourself, and have spent so much time attempting to sooth and bridge the vast reality gap between your egos self perception and the reality, by attempting to make real that parental faith by attempting through the power of you own false will manifest this parental faith into reality by convincing the wider world of it also, in an attention seeking and dramatic way, that in fact your parents prodigal image of you was somehow magically correct. your insistence on playing the grand stage seems almost classically psychopathic in nature.

This argument is as old as the hills and full of greedy behaviour.1 The Ordnance survey data , in its inception though founded by royal charter and even today funded by council planning , when theyre funding is traced back, it fundamentally stems in one way or another from the general publics purse, this is fundamentally “our data” regardless of how they would like to couch copyright issues and fundamentally we still as individuals dont have access to it, of course commerical use should be paid for, though difficult to restrict if personal use were free, but basically we want our data, maybe it should be done that they release all data that is older than 10 years that way we would get nearly all footpath data and pubs etc without affecting there current business in planning data as that needs to be up to date, to take into account modern developments. At the moment we are left in a situation in which ordinary people in openstreetmap are remapping all the stuff that has already been mapped by the OS, which is ridiculous.2 What we fundamentally need as individuals is access to the footpath and hostelry data for free on digital handheld devices, as this would make walking these footpaths for the average person much more feasible, this i currently not possible, The Os charge for this data in the form of maps.3 AN iphone can store 64gb of data, I want 1:10,000 the whole country on my handheld device at my disposal and I dont see why they balk at the idea, the data they have released into the public domain deliberately didnt include footpath data or pub locations and much other stuff, basically making it useless from a walkers perspective.4 The OS and the councils and copyright issues are both standing in the way of human progress, by artificially limiting this data.5 We want openstreetmap to be given OS data at 1:10,000 for the whole country in kml format, at least we could guarantee that they as a body wont try and screw us for our own data as theyre remit is for open data and always will be.

ok lets make this clear mobile versions of graphics can in no way be compared to desktop version of similarly named cards, on average they are at east half the power of their desktop equivalents especially when packed into compact enclosusres, all in one computers and and laptops.

for the record 3d mark vantage for the 6970m is : 11,573
3d mark vantage for the 6970HD desktop card is : 23,499

truth is that AMD are classically deceptive equal to most graphics card manufacturers re their mobile graphics card model numbering, the 6970m is in fact based on the desktop HD 6850 graphics card, which is what makes laptop cards so confusing as in fact they often take the name of a high end desktop card slap an M on it and then use a lower power version of an older desktop card to provide the guts/blue print for the new high end mobile card, so often theyre unrelated to the card there named after.