Dear Mr David Cameron, its time to act and prove your metal as concerns attempts to get immigration under control, if you can’t quickly and effectively repatriate a single pakistani national namely a Mr Rizwan Ahmed Kiyani and his cohorts and those like him, who have been selling citizenship to this country as if it were his own priviledge to do so, and thereby defeating and cheating the immigration system for his own financial advantage, then you will fail at all attempts to control immigration.

His chain of bogus Oxford language colleges located around already heavily over immigrated towns. Its quite obvious we cannot trust foreign people in general, not to abuse any system we set in place, including any system involving tests to determine suitability for citizenship, I myself have signed up to the optimum population trust, as I believe the whole of england is currently over populated , any system of tests will inevitably be abused as experience has always shown in this regard, abandon the tests and abandon the principle of immigration and asylum, we currently do not need any immigration in this culture, 65 million people is enough, and yet we suffer enforced immigration on the european front, and dribbling immigration on the external to EU front that seems larger every year.

The simplest solution is to have an immigration holiday whilst all current cases are evaluated and illegals are removed.
Islands have rights to these measures more so than the european continent with its interconnected country states, if i wished to become a guernsey citizen it might well take me 20 years of living in vastly more expensive non local market property, and this is to protect guernsey citizens. If guernsey is sensible enough to do it, then why may not england have some more sensible controls ? than practically none.

Human rights law and european courts has been preventing us from determining our own immigration numbers for years, this must end.

1. people counting and tracking in and out of the country must be acheived.
2. A £40,000 fine imposable on people overstaying on any visa educational, tourist or otherwise by more than a month over the visa exit date, and extradition to their native land at their own expense.
3. A cap of 10,000 people per annum external to EU immigration
4. A ratio and limit set to EU immigration specific to the size of this isle, that limits inbound in relation to outbound UK people flow within europe, capped at a set limit.
5. Propose a limit on UK immigration from within the EU, to persons who have recently naturalised within the EU zone, ie meaning the initial point of entry must remain the country of domicile for at least 10 years
6. Removal of all failed case and illegals, to be acheived by multiplying the border controls workforce to a suitable size, to make this task practical and feasable rather than living in denial about the people and resources required, and if necessary placing this under the remit of the local police force. who seem to waste the wages we spend on them, doing easy stuff like handing out fines for minor traffic infringements.
7. Allow the biometric Id scheme to go ahead under a voluntary basis, so those british citizens who wish to help border controls to be tightened can do so.
8. To insist all immigrants in process for ctizenship, have to sign up to to biometric ID schemes, so that tracking their breaking of travel rules, is more easily provable.
9. Make british passports the toughest to forge and most rigourous in the world.

You might say god these rules seem a little tough ? well thats only because our system has been unbeleivably lax for so long, in truth the rules have to be twice as tough as youd expect, to achieve a reduction in numbers, back to some sensible level.

cameron wants more tourism, which is all well and good, but can it be acheived without damaging the already precarious immigration reduction issue. whats the percentage of our annual immigration in which tourism visa’s are abused by overstaying illegally.

cameron wants more tourism

couldnt be clearer really the selling of something national a population already owns, back into the private hands of a smaller richer subset of that same population, for a temporary increase in tax revenues.

ie direct theft in which the government hands all possible future growth and control to private shareholders in exchange for limited renumeration in the present.

this usually means the shareholder wins out through the underestimated value of land and property assets or its future growth in such deals, railway privatisation being a classic example of mid management understating, hiding and hijacking asset value from the public.

privatisation also has the often overlooked possibility of complete foreign ownership of national infrastructures, due to share trading and speculation with little control.