share prices and house price falls

Why does a homeowner or a shareholder conclude than when the price of such commodities they own decline from they’re highs that they have somehow made a loss ? regardless of a what price they bought a commodity at ?

on the 30th of december 1997 apples share price was $12.75 no-one who owns apples shares from such a time, has a right to imagine that the losses that occurred post their gains after initial purchase is somehow they’re loss, the shareholder class are parasitic on the energy of those who innovate and push humanity forward, they have a value to foster innovation with investment, but theyre part in the affair overall, should not be over-estimated.

stella v alan, 100k a year for an easy job ? complaint

Apprentice winner Stella English ‘told there is no job by her boss on first day in £100,000 role’

The last thing Alan manufactured of any merit was the CPC6128 in my opinion (designed largely by Roland Perry), viglen ? christ I thought that PC brand died 20 years ago ? They mainly seem to sell very average PC’s at high margin into the public sector, ie a tax waste ? for public facing bureaucrats who are shit at IT sourcing ? and his business empire ? isn’t he mainly just a property developer now ? like most lazy people who want to be rich today and have little actual entrepreneurial skill, I suppose at least ALan did stuff in the fledgling tech industry back then and this is something to be thankful for, property re-developers they skim exorbitant mortgage payments of a tenant or the taxpayer through housing benefit and wait for house price increases its not exactly rocket science. He probably makes a great deal more off doing the apprentice ? than any of his business’s provide in real job opportunities for its contestants ?

And now for Stella English, hmm seems to be guided by the mail shall we say, the number of articles relating to her is bizzarre and her complaining about a scenario in which her job is too easy and shes getting 100,000 a year ? christ go get another job no-one cares for your kind of complaint, suing him for 5 million ? in this case regardless of the panto tv trash that is the apprentice which i would have thought was obvious to anyone but a moron ? how were you ever a trade floor manager ? im on the side of Alan in this case.

This is the kind of stuff Viglen do >

Viglen have beaten a string of overseas suppliers to a prestigious contract worth over £6m, having been selected by the Government Procurement Service to supply a range of computer equipment to the public sector.

The awarding of the contract will see Viglen supplying over 50 central and local government customers including a number of NHS and local education authorities with over 17,000 computers and 10,000 screens over the next two years. This follows a tender process which took the form of a reverse online auction. The contract is a 24-month supply agreement with two 12-month extension periods, and has the potential to grow further to include educational establishments, charitable organisations, social enterprises and the voluntary sector.

Roughly £352 per computer, not too overpriced for the UK taxpayer, and least Viglen are UK based, but they will probably make the major money from this on installation, training and servicing.

What bank should you have your money with in the UK ?

One who only has two set sets of interests to work for >

1: The Depositors not shareholders or traders interests

2: and the interests of the culture in which they operate ie not trading against the interests country they operate in.

ie a building society where the depositors, are the shareholders and any profits to be had by the trading arm are shared by all where a small level of sensible distributed risk is taken with my deposit and in return interest is paid on my account on the basis of profit share from trading to all depositors. Its not really complex is it. you know how all building societies used to be, before they were all bought up and despoiled by the majors for their own advantage.

The BBC now asks the “Cheeky Girls” for their opinion on immigration rather than presenting a natives viewpoint

The unending failure of the BBC to represent the native british persons viewpoint, which surely is a failure of remit considering its the ‘British broadcasting corporation’, they are just a filthy propaganda machine for immigration multiculturalism and european liberal wealthy ideology’s, certainly that has been the ratchet effect of propaganda based enforced representation.

bbc propaganda page here

This is one of the most insulting and crass videos created by the BBC, allowing foreign people living in our midst to promote the idea that the british people are lazy and foreign people aren’t, which is why we should always bend over and and allow them to over-run our cultural borders. The BBC is a criminal organisation, committing organised crime against a culture by promoting the segregative multi-culturalist ideology of a minority liberal wealthy power class against another much more dis-enfranchised majority.

Here is the wisdom of a cheeky girl paraphrased by the BBC !

British newspapers have portrayed her fellow Romanians as “lazy workshy people” the Cheeky Girl singer Monica Irimia said in her This Week film on immigration.

She thinks the UK benefits system made it “too easy for some” and the government should do more to encourage people to work.

But the singer said the blame should not be put on immigrants legally claiming what they are entitled to, as she recalled how her record company went under and how she could have lived off benefits in Britain.

She said the prime minister could freeze benefits, but he must not close the door on immigration from the EU. Restrictions stopping Bulgarians and Romanians working in UK are set to be lifted next year.

WTF WTF who the fuck is she to be pontificating about what should be done !!!!!!!

The BBC takes no comment on the post as usual for fear of the publics opinion, as it like to censor opposing or descenting views by not representing them or allowing them airtime in the cultural imagination.

The media the government and industry have exhibited no ability over the last 40 years to preserve or represent the rights of native people to self determinism or true democracy, they have never cared for or asked for the opinion of the native man on the question of immigration in fact they deliberately set off down a road as fast as possible that revolved around ignoring the common mans opinion of this matter, as though in some liberal paternalistic way they knew better, this behaviour as always wreaks of ego and that of the gambler who having made a bad bet rather than learning from it and facing their failure, repeatedly doubles up, continuing with false faith in their erroneous gamble. and in attempt to bolster their own views whenever there is clear evidence that this decision was not beneficial they have attempted to ignore such evidence and turn all the harder full speed for their ideological agenda. This price of this blindness has has been to erode our cultural identity at every turn by the idealogical agenda of the international liberal set, ideology whose net result in practice has always been to shit on the vocal opinion of the native class of poor who cannot represent themselves potently within their own culture power and control structure as they are generally ignored. Politics … like the banks and the media are currently morally, intellectually and culturally bankrupt.

Companies making money from out of copyright music ?

Companies making money from out of copyright music ?

since musical recording copyright should last 50 years ?

how come someone is still making money and charging for their music on itunes ? I guess the itunes stuff is a just for your convenience type scenario.

so actually nearly all the inkspots can be downloaded for free from the internet archive, because they are out of copyright, and plenty of other great out of copyright music, if your dying and you dont wish anyone to benefit financially from your music you can of course pass it all into the public domain.

the irksomeness of having to deal with female genital mutilation within our cultural borders

It would be nice not to have to deal with these problems in our country in the first place or have to even consider FGM, Oh I forgot there is a simple solution its called not allowing these people to enter the country in the first place to devolve and distract our culture from more important things, than concentrating on trying to solve a genital mutilation problem we never had to deal with before importing backward peoples ! but of course that would involve having border controls that weren’t porous like a sponge because of Europe’s insanity, or having some liberal enforced agenda of immigration and multiculturalism under some vague guise that nativity in itself must be racist if your white or western.

and why do we show pictures od distressed white children in this article, is it because were too feared to label the practice with imagery of african immigrants ?

Who says money and fame does not buy feminine youth and beauty

Happy together: Kelsey and his wife Kayte Walsh are seen at the Vanity Fair Oscars party at the end of last month

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2289121/Kelsey-Grammer-cuts-price-Beverly-Hills-home-1million-struggles-shift-property.html#ixzz2MmyqLDwy

BT rip off NON use Line Rental charges

Extra bill charges for non usage, whether it’s in your small print or not, I consider these charges as unfairly described or offered within the advertising, non usage of a service should not incur extra fees, I will be taking this up with the ombudsman unless resolution is swift. When I buy goods or a service like a monthly line rental, I expect to see a flat price advertised that does not involve hidden conditions relating to being charged extra for none use of said services, beyond the flat fee advertised as the services cost. If these charges are not removed from all the months in which you been charging me well beyond the headline line rental price I signed up for on your website.

I would also like to know at which point you can provide evidence agreed to be on Unlimited Weekend plan ? As I do not remember signing up for a £14.60 line rental ? also you are charging me for £2.70 for caller display I would also like to know what evidence you have I signed up for that extra as well, as you appear to be charging me extra for that due to non minimum call being made, all of this extra charges for use stinks of deceptive business practice in my opinion. have not had a telephone attached to my line for some considerable time, over which period you have been making the extra charges to my monthly costs via direct debit.