Timothy Leary and 60’s philosophy

Timothy Leary statement Manifesto

I propose any philosophy espoused by timothy Leary is propaganda sent from the aged bankrupt 60′s generation who have done more damage to destabilise harmonious people cultures than can be quantified, the entire philosophical viewpoint was that of a break with past a standard youthfull rebellion, a disruption an upturning of the status quo , these activitys are in conflict with the word peace, offering the crimes up of “the white male power manipulators” of the “other generation” as being in some binary and tragically simplistic way, a guilty by default scenario. That endless expression on the 60′s generations lips “the man” like a child asserting there father is to blame, no wonder now to imagine the era we live in today in which unless you are foreign, queer or feminine, you have tragically been born white male western and heterosexual and are thereby assumed guilty racist and fundamentally wrong and flawed beyond recovery and should not have the ear of culture in any sense. and failing by the following qualitys ? Let’s tackle just a few statements –
They are bores:
It is precisely the 60′s generation who sought nought more than their own egotistical gratification under the guise of peace and free love, which I might say was childish and equally boring, as it negated to recognise the true human nature in that although one can try to impose peace and love on humans, in reality, the two qualitys are quite misunderstood, and less dynamic than many other qualitys and should not be considered as idealised philosophys, peace being a static state in an absolute sense, and love being riddled with competition prejudice hope desire loss, disappointment, love being a much more dynamic word is riddled with much darker sinues not readily apparent, to the vapid many who affected the nature of the hippy mindset. They were no doubt many in the 60′s generation who didn’t get a free ride on the love boat who were excluded from it in someway the revolutionary group must always by its nature have a boundary or there is nothing to overturn, and the 60′s revolution ran out of steam once it had been inevitably been commercialised and packaged and the group of subscribers became too large and diverse in philosophy and demographic makeup to hold themselves together and like any psychedelic bubble must burst as any flower has its time in the sun.

They hate beauty ?
Another vapid subjective binarism, after much thought over many years beauty to me means coherence, but to say white man power culture hates beauty ? In what sense ? The media portrays nothing but an endless parade of visual beauty, by the measure of advertising alone it takes the top 10% of the beautiful people and aspirationally projects that over the other 90% who could not achieve such beauty. Why do humans beings endure or even tolerate this presentation because even the ugly are prejudiced subconsciously against the ugly, this is almost hard wired into the psyche of breeding creatures.

They hate sex ?
I don’t know whether it’s just me, but I doubt we have ever lived in a more promotedly or highly and emotionally irresponsibly sexualised era ? Look at the availability of its imagery, the unceasing expansion of the global population on a limited planet, peoples views of the words peace liberty love and sex rarely recognise the conflicting limitations of such words when measured relative to the limited environment we live in. I’d say if there is less sex in existence today it’s not for a lack of its promotion ? It is the population pressure that the free love boomer generation created, that as a hangover today, has begun to stunt young native western populational reproduction, by the scarcity of resource to make it civily viable to the same standard, as was possible for their parents generation, combined with the new rude dribellous longevity of a life, science has enabled. And the fact thate the sense of white guilt that the all things foreign loving 60′s generation has assured the destruction of the grand children of said 60′s generation as a large factor in the breeding populations demographic makeup ? Today, 60′s influenced loved up over immigration, in many cases being the tool of their grandchildrens demise. The 60,s generation were a foam of youthful expense created by a hard fought for excess, they’re parents had worked for through measured and sobre existences. In generations that remained still acutely aware of the sacrifices their anticedents had made for them and their responsibility toward the generations yet to come.
They hate life ?
Whereas of course hippys get to claim the love of life as their property ? Dingbat really . . . all creatures love life it’s three quarters of what most of the problems in the world are over, peoples desire to at minimum cling onto the quality of life they have and perhaps garner a better more fulfilled expanded one most inevitably often whether consciously or not at someone else’s or the environments expense, often something that previous generations taken by borrowing resource wise in a profligate manner from the futures of generations yet to come.

And By the way who are “they” ? Your parents ? Your children ? The ones who didn’t subscribe to the fascist liberalist propaganda you espoused ? The people outside of the group ? Even the hippys had to be triballistic in nature, because that is human nature, just hippys asserted virtue to their group and guilt to others? As most youth movements always do.

I almost consider it beneath my intellect to make a critique of such declarational manifestos, as by their form alone and the fickle nature of words, and the boldness of their presumptions, must inevitably be heavily flawed. Though as with all good binary story fiction must be riven with some bright quality metal to philosophically headlining simplistically attract the minds eye, yet always attempt to make too much of their own statements.

True statements are often quiet and subtle in their true nature, often compromised toward many objectives which when viewed in parallel and in context of the group which democratically believe and espouse in them, will sum in a diffuse way to an enhancement of the groups existence in general.

Best rucksack in the world

let me save you allot of research, if you want a lightweight rucksack, with a breathable off the back backsystem with frame and 58 litres of storage will cover you, then look no further than the osprey exos 58 rucksack, weighing in at at 1.14 kg it is the best rucksack money can buy with its feature set.

I prefer the green version but your preference

http://www.ospreypacks.com/en/product/superlight/exos_58