“positive discrimination” can only mean discrimination against another group unmentioned in the initial statement about its use and application.

mainly used against the possible benefit of a native group or a majority group.

truth is everything should be offered by merit, and merit alone.

and at the same time we should tackle generally the inequitys of poverty and class propoganda that lead to that awardable merit surfacing disproportionately in certain groups.

But when one can claim a right to a job due to ones skin colour or the subjectively perceived invisible oppression put on one by others, related to ones religion or race in comparison to the suppossed majority, then i suppose thats any easier way to get a Job than by merit, not that the majority of jobs make much use of skill or inteligence, versus drudgery and life wasting.

Hence why london is now so foreign, and all the public facing services and businesses seem only to employ foreign people or be owned by them. And hence in that process that your native englishman can feel utterly disenfranchised and islolated in his own culture, as he forced to live and work alongside all that is alien to him, that does not provide cultural succour and encouragement to his development and growth.

basically positive discrimination is as bad as any kind of discrimination.

its basis is unfounded and unhealthy.