Politics have become such a blunt instrument in this country, that whomever we vote into power, there is no real change visible. If we are ever to halt the long instigated heathian multicultural over immigration policy, that has become such blindly pursued and enshrined legislation, ever approved of by the insulated overly ‘pc’ ‘right on’ middle to upper classes, who do not live alongside nor suffer the consequences of such immigration. Which has already decimated the impoverished literate english non claiming lower middle class in London, and many other major cities in England for the last forty years, and has led the frailer and more eccentric social groups, to become extreme minority’s in their own time and country.

I think these marginalised groups may eventually, and very belatedly turn to BNP style partys, in an almost futile reactionary way, as the only political choice, capable of tempering and realising actual change in this country as regards immigration, so as to voice the truth of a situation executed upon them, of which society has informed them in no uncertain terms, they have no right to express dissension about over the last the last 40 years, unless they wished to be perceived as outcasts within a culture which pretty much affirms to your face that you are living in a replacements culture, in which you can be traded in for more pliable citizens from abroad, the people who have approved and implemented this gagging/binding of opinion, on immigration, as being only a positive story, are often those who will benefit from exploiting said people as a cheaper workforce, but will not themselves be in direct competition with these people for housing or jobs. The frailer eccentric and creative groups who have been in direct competition with immigrants over the last 20 years, know collectively as a population that even if they did resort to to voting for partys, with a much stronger and more capable stance on immigration, their fate to a large extent is already sealed.

Often the media will brand anyone into obscurity as facist and far right if you even suggest the idea, that curtailing immigration is needed, or question the idea of the uk brand of “segregative multi-culturality” as having been anything but a fantastic success. When in reality your really just standing up for the living makeup of english people culture remaining, who do not have the money or the resources or energys to defend themselves against the tide of energetic immigrants that has washed over them and their communitys, and as is the case for allot of the decent tribes of the world, has or is washing them from the pages of history in favour of more mundane and robust, plainly self serving types.

Sadly it is our own ammicability and cultural codes of morality, and not speaking loudly of ones views virtues, which has in fact, been our undoing in an often aggressive less moral highly vocalised segregative multiculturality in which majority collective of supposedly minority voices is most often heard louder than a the nuclear native voice, in this endlessly corporatised commercialised immigrant centric society, where the middle and upper class groups who only perceive culture as being dead things like old buildings arts economics food and consumerism, who probably deliberately engendered this pride in cultural beliefs of say a “reserved personality” etc, was historically sub-consciously projected on to the lower orders as a form of demonstrative patriotism, but was really used as a tool to better manipulate the classes they wished to manipulate.

In reality the powerfull rich and mainly feudally criminally descendent upper classes (whom we probably should have cleansed from power in order to make england a healthier place a long time ago, by having a revolution equal to that of France’s), are often the worst kind of self serving aggressive egotists who’ve rarely if ever demonstrated restraint as concerns promotional and self serving behaviour, and this in turn has allowed them to use the tool of immigration as a force, to better manipulate society to their own benefit, to bring in better worker slaves, who play the minor roles offered as crumbs from the table, better than the native surfs. Or who can adapt more willingly to the personality types, this rootless disloyal internationalist ruling class, extol as virtues suitable for promotion.

It is this aggressive class whose political sway seems to be in direct proportion to their vast fortunes, that insulate themselves from the very vaguerys of societys impact on the population, who seem to legislate upon and have the majority of power in deciding on immigrational policys, that will not effect them at all. In quick summation : immigration is devastating tool used in class war, by the powerfull against the weak. And island populations have offered suffered from this imbalanced prejudice.

Truth is whomever should live in this isle and from whichever culture, we no longer need more people of any type in this isle, it is a straight fact. There isn’t a magical greater population size in the future, which will suddenly bestow on us any extra benefits or civility, as a culture In fact the opposite is easily provable, greater population sizes in limited areas tend to lead to less civility not more, less space, less quiet, less stability of existence and less of the opportunitys in life necessary to activate the potential of any particular human being, as exemplorarily portrayed by the plethora of reality TV shows, obsessed with unjustifiably whittling down the hungry many, to so few for some opportunity or other, most things by lack of supply must be shared, amongst a body of people growing ever more aggressive to self serving attain them, and this does not lead to a greater evolvement of the best of human nature, but its devolution instead.

If anything we could do with a reduction in population, such that society can focus more on utilising the potential of each and every human being more, rather than just creating ever increasing numbers of less enfranchised people. Its also a pity that the infantile economic and intellectually bankrupt vision of the past, as regards future pension payment policys were all planned on the unsustainable idea of an inverse pyramid of practically exponential population growth, stretching infinitely into the future of a small and finite island.

Truth is this, the idea that every human being is precious and the more of us the better, is a historical delusion we must face down, as in reality an excess of humanity is not usefull for the environment or can even be fully intellectually validated when it comes to our own interests. Sooner or later we will have to face this question at some point in the future, let us hope that it’s not so late in the day, that we cannot avoid the inevitable backlash of basic environmental laws, that always put a check on any population that outgrows its resources or environment.

In terms of the cultural identity crisis of the now isolated english in the major city’s, halting immigration now will make little difference, as a quick look at the makeup in childrens parks, playgrounds and schools in inner citys the country over, seems to portray the future of England, and it is no longer a recognisably native English one. It will be, too little too late, but it might be better than nothing. The history of the past fifty years could be entitled in a book called “England a history of passive cultural suicide”.

Of course the financially secure powerfull upper classes, the lower claiming classes , and a good proportion dull conforming suburban salaried middle classes, happy with their consumerist lives, limited in design and nature and with lower birth rates, will always generally survive but they are not the whole of england nor the most innovative sectors of this countrys people. And if you do not fit into one of these polarised classes your chances of survival reduce dramatically, and it is this diversity and eccentricity of english nature which is being diminished and narrow banded. In truth the more risk you take with career or creative life decisions, the more over educated you are, chances are the smaller family size you will create, but in a way the loss of children may benefit society with a direct correlation in increased innovative careers, and the less innovative, more stable and lower to averagely salaried you are, I’d say the higher the family size, and this trend i see played out in the immigrant sectors where theyre ambitions for their children are often pointed toward middle class salaried jobs from a which a family lifestyle can be paid for, and the burden of innovative risk taking and overeducation has been successfully propagandised in the native young, without providing an equally innovative work market to satisfy these ambitions. Culture often benefits in an unwritten way from those who instead of investing in children and large family progenating, invest in lifeworks careers or ideas, and this is most often not measured by culture.

It is a great pity that the historical debate, that there should have been about immigration was sidelined by three factors, firstly a generation of 60’s youth who’s egotistically led amicablity, to all of the world, was a perspective generated by a viewpoint always falling outside of their own stayed culture, by dint of being the first generation who could afford global travel and were fed and watched and often miscomprehended global events, politics from a heavily propagandised, new and almost limitlessly powerfull tv led culture. This age of cheaper Air travel also ushered in a freedom of movement that multiplied the potential for economic migrationary movement.

This 60’s amicability was paid for, at the express expense of future generations of poor lower to middle class creative intellectuals, who would in reality face the competition from these more aggressive immigrant cultures, and would have to live with the burden of historical cultural moral beliefs and subtletys of behaviour, that immigrants were not hindered by in their progression through the culural heirarchy, and these cultural subtletys in turn would limit the standard natives ability to survive globally, in this en-harshened global environment of movement. Where benefit was to be had by those fickle enough to emigrate to opportunity, which often for those middle classes that emigrated had an almost instant advantage of exotic cache to be gained by emigrating to a culture not ones own.

This in turn was amplified by UK politicians wishing to perceives themselves as people operating and focusing on more of an international stage (Heaths yachting and euro love) than a national one, this was further aided by an dominance emergence and love for american culture that had been growing since the fifties, and Politicians sadly were like the general population drawn to emulation of US culture in all policys, including that of immigration. Though in america the subtle difference being, that their culture is to a large extent founded on immigration in recent times, where ours was not

Culture in england upto the forties and for 200 years before had been through a historically at least, remarkably stable border period, which had led to a great sense of cultural identity and an extensive and thorough common bond of identity, class issues aside. It was probably this post imperial unified self confidence in the strength of our own culture, which led to the class that created empire, making self agrandising unwarranted promises on behalf of the less outward looking natives that remained in the isle, to the children of empire that they were equal citizens and by that recognition, had rights to some sort to domicile in England. Also there was a wish to perceive, in a globally severely economically diminished post war England, that we might still compete on a world stage with america on equal footing in some areas, and as such we were going to compete on an economically expansionist pro immigrational policy, which to a large extent still holds true to today.

Simultaneously to this any debate their might have been was further closed off, by Enoch Powell who failed to realise the impact of middle class reactionarys against his own poor understandings of the true nature of immigration, and views he held that were based on unfounded judgements about people of various types, whereas he would have been better restricting his views to people in general and as a whole. whichever way he also was instrumental is sealing off true debate about immigration from political and societal agenda for about 40 years.

I now, in my generation can perceive, im likely to face the extinction of my own billion year reproductional crusade, by a culture that turned on the subtlelty of natures it had encouraged from the post 60’s attitude, of individual cretaivity and innovation being essential to a society’s progress, when in fact such talents are now largely un-required, in comparison to self promotion regardless of talent, and a culture whose 60’s and 70’s parents, wrote in to the future lives of their children competivitys they themselves did not have to suffer, by supplanting my cultural class with peoples designed for harsher environs, more easily satisfied with plainer outlooks and ambitions pointed toward a family rather than career orientation, that did not carry the burden of my own cultural beliefs when operating in this society. I realise its the media, that batter people into not being able to put theyre name down against immigration, out of fear of racist accusation, when reality now at this stage of events, its just a reality standing up enough, for their own cultural identity such as not to be washed away, something which many other cultures, I have witnessed when travelling in the world, seem capable of doing for themselves, without any self recrimination ?

And this Sates of United Europe uber bureaucracy, thats is engulfing consuming and emasculating enlglish culture, and is accelerating the loss of identity of all european nations, by trying to mix the populations of the poorer nation into the richer ones, In the process diminishing the bio diversity of all european cultures, and spreading a half americanised corporate mono-culture of monetarist enslavement, made by possible by promoting the artificial human religion of western amplified mass consumerism, in compensation for the loss of an almost unquantifiable human subtlety of nature eccentricity and cultural belief. Those that object to this will as always, be marginalised into unwritten obscurity in historical terms, the truth of the situation thence distorted in future retrospect, such that the truth of what actually occurred shall be so successfully marred as to be unprovable, and the history as written by those with an agenda whose selectively chosen history will become the truth.