Category Archives: Monetarist

Sir Fred Goodwin should remain a Social Pariah anywhere in the world

Posted on by
Reply

Sir Fred Goodwin should be a “Social Pariah” as most of the powerful and monetary elite should be treated, especially those related to virtual money entity’s, he is the poster boy for this kind of self delusional retarded illogical monetarists, where perceived value is most important, and corruptive behaviour occurs to raise the percieved value of extremely subjective virtual money assets so that these companys can then buy real assets with real values, organisations like these have the potential to buy up the real world in trade for financial assets that dont really exist, these people are very dangerous, and often if they were clinically analysed would be proven to be psychotic individuals. They go on to make mega losses and then retire to huge luxurious lifestyles insulated from the general world by the large monetary rewards that are gifted to them by their corrupt cronies upon leaving the club, with barely any relation to logic.

These people are also often internationalist’s with no loyalty to countrys, governments, Continue reading →

750,000 estimated illegal immigrants in the uk 450,000 in london

Posted on by
Reply

750,000 estimated illegal immigrants in the uk 450,000 in london

Boris’s suggestion lets have an amnesty ? How about you actually send some immigrants back boris ?!?!?!!? our prisons seems to be full of them and were failing to send them back even when they ask to be repatriated, and how come it costs £11,000 to send them home, my flights to south america and expenses for a month were less than £1100, what are you doing in those ineffective and bloated bureaucracys ? basically your thinking about calling an amnesty purely on economic grounds, which is what weve done for the last 40 years ? and what has it led too ? a fracturing of our culture a complete loss of that common bond of identity that british culture once had, all immigration has responded to over years is too increase economy and forget the cultural implication and that is what has led us to here ?

basically before you can have an amnesty prove to me you have a capacity to send people back in the first place, otherwise its just disguised incompetance dressed up as an economic boon, no wonder it costs £4 billion to send all these people back when it seems to cost the taxpayer £11,000 to get rid of each person back to their country of origin.

Insular Patels

Posted on by
Reply

read this article on the beeb :

“http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8095032.stm”

4th comment down is my view on this :

“Insular and money obsessed. What’s impressive about that?”
Christopher King, Islington

Its tiring to see the result of segregative multiculturalism in britain, almost lovingly approved of by the middle to upper class media set, whose views on immigration through the BBC handbook of dogma appear to allow all employess only one viewpoint which is, that its a wonderfull idea, 249,000 patels in britain ? seemingly only marrying within themselves. Great ! not ! Monetarily self obsessed as well, its good to note we allowed, one of the most racist and primitive cultural structures, free access to setup in in britain, the caste system. Not the kind of people I’d like to have a dinner conversation with, But we seemed to have invited allot of religiously primitive, archaic insular groups into this country, probably who felt they’re form of insularity was not welcome elsewhere, under the guise of some form of hair brained segregative multi-culturalism.

When those that are invited into our culture positively avoid from embracing it, if they don’t embrace british culture, the only part they came for was an enhanced standard of living, monetarism, consumerism, and by the sounds of the article the opportunity to setup exploitative profitable little empires ? But then I guess theyre no worse than some sections, of many other insular religious and ethnic groups that live in this country, naming no names, but really I thought english culture had evolved beyond this kind of class or groupism crap in the 1950’s, but were seemingly being dragged back to the dark ages.

EH Modernism & Simon Thurley

Posted on by
Reply

I think in simple terms the simon literaly percieves himself to have an opinion that is superior to 99% of the population, which is why I guess his ego allows him to run around browbeating and abusing people in general, maybe the poor sods been edited to look that way, but certainly he does not come of well in the programme in question, or maybe that is just the general personality trait and function of someone at the top of an organisation, whichever his arrogance and lack of humility, is objectionable to observe. But that is the filthy Modern trend today and hes no doubt only in keeping with the organisation, which by the view of the website sees its prime role as self promotion of its own brilliance ? As far as I can see English Heritage mainly preserves Continue reading →