No she not a spy, shes alledgedly just “immature, calculating, emotional and self-centred young woman” according to the trial. classic …

Katia Zatuliveter age … 26

aide ? to

Mike Hancock MP age … 65

according to the telegraph :

“Katia Zatuliveter, 26, had affairs with Mike Hancock, a member of the defence select committee, and with a Dutch diplomat, a German Nato official and a UN worker.”

hmm that’s one way to stay in the country sleep with a 65 year old politician . . . . and a whole collection of older powerful burocrats.

“Miss Zatuliveter, who is being represented by a media handler and is expected to sign an exclusive deal to sell her story, said: “I feel fine. I am very happy, incredible relief. My parents are ecstatic.”

yes im sure they are ecstatic about who theyre daughter has been sleeping with ? all quotes referenced from these two articles :

Read more:
and here

wow shes such a moral human being ? Katia It’s so grim having to climb that greasy corrupt morally bankrupt political pole, but I guess your prepared to.

she said of the older men >

“She also appreciated their “humour, sophistication and kindliness,” the panel said. A personal diary included “excruciating detail” about her attempts to ensnare men and revealed she was an “immature, calculating, emotional and self-centred young woman”.”

the truth will out …

Great another useless contribution to the people that we allow to stay resident in this overly liberal culture.

MP Hancock – you sir are a truly predictable 65 year old man > GROW UP > and stop having women 39 years your junior who work for you ? and concentrate on the job at hand that portsmouth needs you to get on with !

“They said Mike Hancock, the Lib Dem MP for Portsmouth South, who appeared to mix with glamorous Russian and Ukrainian women and was supportive of the Russian government “would have been of long-standing interest to one or more Russian intelligence agencies.”
This liberal certainly does like immigration, especially when it get him access to young female russian ones to play around with, Mike . . . . christ you make politics look grimey. hopegully you can climb back into obscurity.

Christ and my day has been disturbed by the furtive goings on between a 65 year old liberal idiot and a needy for fathering insecure political sugardaddy pole climber, god why do I now feel the need to vomit and a general hatred for the continuingly corrupted behaviour of the 60’s generation ?

Her sister and brother-in-law, with whom she lived in Bradford, did not accept her relationship with Mr Hancock but the panel said: “However odd it might seem, she fell for him.”

“Miss Zatuliveter said afterwards that she was “very happy” with the decision and her parents were “ecstatic.” Her tearful sister, Polina, who lives in Chorley, Lancashire, rushed from the court room to ring them when the judgment came through.”

and Polina her sister of course magically by chance just happens as well to be living in the good old UK, because the UK border is effectively non existent ! and half run by naturalised immigrants allot of the time ? bloody bullshit this country is degenerating into, and this story evidence of it.

John Bercow Portrait and Arms

A lesson in why today there is no dignity to be had, in creating a modern coat of arms.

first of all today they are redundant and irrelevant, and secondly they inevitably turn into a personal marketing campaign ?

The portrait ? > Vomit faux realist trash, looks like a bady copy of a photograph, to realist in intent yet not enough perception ?

skilled-ish but without the insight of statement and story and depth that a true portrait should be about.

John Bercow Portrait

Coat of arms ? and I quote from the beeb >

“The Speaker has also been given a coat of arms with a ladder representing his rise as the son of a taxi driver; balls for his love of tennis – one each for England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland – with the rainbow symbol of equality and pink triangles for his support of gay rights.”

hmm John no-one may have informed you, but designing your coat of arms, should not be treated as an excercise to throw all the vomitous things you like, plus vain statements related to how you’d like to be perceived by the public, into a bin bag shake them about and paste them on some coloured card ?

John Bercow coat of arms

John :

I like Tennis . . . that has to be on there (dribble), one for each country of the union because I wouldn’t want to be perceived as being unfare to anyone ever ? and pink triangles and rainbows ! :)(why not some fluffy bunnys too ?) for my support of gay rights :), a ladder to represent the social climbing of my family. . . . . ooooooh and a samosa, I do like indian samosa’s . . . . . dribble, that will get the ethnic crowd on my side, ooh and can we squeeze in Doctor Who, and throw in some sabre’s I want people to know I’m a bloke ? and for a strapline can we put on it “all are equal” ?

John in case you hadn’t realised the majority of people, are not equal in anything, Pay, Rights, democracy, schooling, life expectancy, Sexual satisfaction, Happiness, Wealth ? I could go on ? The universe abhore’s static universal balance John, all is in fact in uproarious motion and unfair imbalance all the bloody time, so far in history it’s been the natural state of affairs ?

Christ what an embarassment the whole waste of £37,000 of taxpayers money it was … and this in recession ? did john ever delude himself this would turn out well for him ?

Ed milliband Vocal butt trumpet for the unions F him

I might hate the cameron government for its weak and inneffectual inability to cut immigration figures, but on this front hes right, the public sector pension figures for payments in and out have to add up and make fiscal sense, the difference cannot be subbed up and exploited from poorer recompensed private sector workers.

Public Sector Workers should try it in the private sector for a year, they’d soon realise they’ve often got it easy in contrast to most poor private sector workers, self employed, I’m self employed I earn under £16,000 a year and will no doubt end up on the state pension, The idea these public sector workers with their nice comfy pensions want to preserve their pot, and arent prepared to pay for the actual cost of providing the value in their own pensions, the poor private sector taxpayer with rubbish or no pensions can’t sub up these people anymore, the pubic sector seems riddled with self entitled balding union men, feminist women and immigrants all bonded together by the magical solidarity of the desire of money from the taxpayer. And allot of these public sector workers are employed to serve another group of people who live under a false umbrella of self entitlement the benefits system. Theres a building with solar panels near me called a “refugee therapy centre” ? No public money should have been or ever should be wasted on this kind of rubbish. The only valid point the public sector workers have is the the bankers have not yet been made to learn any lesson, they are still to be dealt with. If anyone was to be taxed it should be the bankers, but lets be honest if you let the unions get their selfish way they can wreck an economy > I lived in the seventies I remember. You cant expect to be given, what you aren’t paying for, simple logic.

Some public sector workers get three years severance pay ? at the taxpayers expense ? wtf I get 0 severance pay in my line of work, you just go out and find new work …

“The workers united will never be defeated” ? that kind of crap is only valid in a culture that lives by economic sense and and has the spare / slush capital to pay for such bullshit sloganistic diatribe spouted by the ignorant, public sector workers have never generated the taxes necessary to pay their own wages, that responsibility comes down to the private sector.

Decent men and women day in day out … being attacked ? emotive and unproveable language ? decent how would anyone know ? attacked ? attacked plain emotive, an insistance that you pay in enough money, to pay for your own pension draw at the end its simple money logic.

Pensions over the last 20 years have always worked on the wrong assumption re working population doubling, pensions are not a pyramid scheme, you need to pay a measure proportionate to the money youd eventually like to take out, money doesn’t just magic out of anywhere. revisions to the compensation offered in peoples pensions is dependent on economy and markets just like anything else. Which currently are in the tank and will remain so for some time.

New BBC layout the Feedback I gave

Its all surface gloss, too many elements on the page distract the eye, they all scream for the same level of attention ? there is little flow, where’s the breadcrumb trail ? and the section on the top just appears as a random undefined selection of guff without titles, Like you somehow have an ability to predict what I’m interested in ? don’t presume, just like a newspaper lead with the major stories and work down, without titles it makes it mainly illegible from an eye scanning and readability perspective compared to the previous layout, this is due to the use of too many high contrast tones, not enough tones are laid back, sub headings body text have as much presence as heading etc. Sadly I have a degree in Graphic information design and understand UI and HCI intimately, so see these terrible design decisions being made all the time. Don’t fix what ain’t broken, stop wasting the licence fee with endless redesigns, improve and evolve not total revamp just for the sake of a glitzier appearance, Any site user can eventually adjust to anything it doesn’t mean you made an improvement when they eventually memorise a new layout, you should not act like a supermarket shifting the crap around on the shelves for the sake of it, just to irritate the customer. The middle bar “BBC online today” etc disappears, in the layout. Has this been designed by a chinese person ? knowing you the beeb ? probably … is the answer > why else would you place a main nav bar on the bottom right ? stop messing with your customers heads unecessarily especially at their expense ? by utilising the imagination of people whos main aim is to make an ego statement of their own design prowess.

Remember EVOLVE it not REVAMP it in its entirety. Remember you should be carrying peoples acquired knowledge/learning of your website layout with you not discarding what theyve bothered to learn already ?

I cant turn off the crap stuff on the page I dont want ? this is a huge negative compared to the old design ? disregarding that half the time sport seemed to find its way back in my layout whether i wanted the rubbish or not, that you could have fixed in the old site rather than revamping it …

I could go on but thats enough I think ? after all im not getting a FAT consultancy fee for this ?