Lets be Honest the coastline of this island however seemingly geographically arbitrary is a nice logical naturally occurring border, that thankfully was a natural lynchpin to hold the tide of war. This is an Island nation, which lives in close and sensible “economic” fraternity with its continental neighbours. But it makes no sense to subdivide the peoples of this island once more, however alluring or intellectually stimulating to you as a historian – that fantasy might be, certainly with the levels of population we have now. There is sadly a trend within the human psyche to perceive we will be better off if we split away into the sub group of population we feel most like our own personal identity or class. I also on the other hand in my own opinion would declare because we are not part of the continent, we need a distinct and individual setup to the other nations of Europe for whom closer harmony, but that which does not denigrate their sovereign democracy’s, national identity, specific culture or self determinism, should embrace their neighbours in economic cooperation and fraternity a little tighter than we might ourselves desire. But I also believe we need to be clear about the “democratic rights” of the people to national self determinism, and return rather than concede any more power to the european ideology, and make no mistake – no country called Europe exists, we don’t say I’m going to Europe because it vitally means little to those people within it, It does however mean something if your an external immigrant or a country on the peripherary.

To me the most vital thing is “stable borders” and however wrongly I perceive the periods of historical peace, I do perceive they prove that stable borders are vital and that factional divide in culture is most often lethal ? Populations are often unified by time and aged bloody history, who now live in relative harmony without an increasing sense of subdivision or division from each other, without unnecessary super-numerary groupings. That is what has been damaged by 55 years of enforced and unquestioned imported ideology of multiculturalism and diversity by a political and media elite, the BBC deeply complicit in this, whose representatives, seem only able to express undemocratic left of centre middle-upper class viewpoints if they wish to remain in work. Which never clearly deals with the dichotomy of diversity and unity, and the real issues involved in the multicultural agenda.

Mass Immigration – is war on the native – wherever it occurs in history, America, Australia – and especially so – on Island natives – new zealand – andamans – jamaica – etc. Which a certain class of our antecedents with visions of empire and policies, historically visited upon others at the price of morality for some technical evolution and profit elsewhere, post war we were almost beginning to heal the historical division of class and retreat from the arrogance of empire, with a timely and needed epiphany of thinking.

Now as a nation were are rapidly being consumed by a lack of unity and increased divineness on every front masquerading under the guise of government approved ‘segregative’ multiculturalism and ‘diversity’ agendas – such enshrined liberal ideology, Which has in practice largely worked to enfranchise the immigrant, subdivide the nation into the new “communities”, which is really code for a panoply of religious and ethnic differences growing larger and receiving the benefit of positive discrimination, extra democracy through the governments ear being permanently bent by “community leaders” ? the wealthy industrial set benefit from more compliant labour and multiple property owning speculators from rents and a direct collection of and unscrupulous redirection of taxpayers money via the housing benefit system to the private wealth sector of the multiple property owning via rents in this culture – often statements are made about subjectively perceived economic gains as justification and some kind of unexplainable fuzzy moral superiority – for multiculturalism, which is really just a global philosophical export, which is saturation bombed from american culture and media. America admittedly in its current form is founded on the idea of multiculturalism and mass immigration but its one of the few countries that can sensibly claim that.

Meanwhile the return to feudalism continues apace. There are many natives today who without the fiscal bubble wrap to avoid it, carry the extra psychological burden of these enshrined policies as regards the reality of immigration, who have little choice but to square the circle of working in wholly foreign workforces, living in wholly foreign immigrant dominated areas and send their kids to schools where the first language of 90% of the children, is no longer english, and face the cultural impact of these factors on their children, and to imagine that the british working class must be declared racist for not showing pleasure at this reality and prospect they mainly alone face. They and they’re families ‘communities’ have largely had to deal with the real effects of middle to upper class liberalist hand wringing, In the remnants of what was once a community they recognised and felt even if inappropriately – comfortable with.

To not recognise this is to salaciously hide from the tribalism that all peoples and classes display, including those immigrants in this culture who naturally as any people most often coagulate together, history would indicate it takes hundreds of years to resolve the divisive effects of immigration or invasion, that itself may only take a few to undertake, how long before the invading normans in their castles realised that conducting a policy of isolationary and oppressive dominance and segregative division would never be sustainable or in their long term interests. Britain still feels the effects of that feudalist divisiveness to this day.

The history of everything human is the slow turbulent movement from ignorance to understanding, when will we again understand that which in 1940 we understood and defended the right of – each stable nation to democratic self determinism, against a german led hegemony, which then and still now is a vital idea worth defending, The european ideology does not well represent that ideal, but is merely an alternate subversion of it. Economic communities and pacts are fine, but to dissolve the sovereign borders of the nations involved and have fully open border policies, has done little but advance the cause of the mobility of more compliant and cheaper labour. Europe has done little to retain the efficient manageability of small government, small can be beautiful and a more practical form of governance. Europe is the opposite of that, the perceived efficiencies and trade pact negotiation power are lost against the cost of the ideologically driven mega bureaucracy, cultural identity, social division and a sense of unity and purpose that all cultures need to succeed long term.