371,000 x £26,000 per annum = 9.646 billion pounds ? per annum

These figures in now way account for the children born here from these immigrants claiming off the benefit system ?

effectively they will equate to :

individual corporate vested interest removing entire sites from the internet for individual comments or content placed by users on those websites will basically lead and equate to, total corporate censoring of the entire internet for their own interests.

PROTECT IP / SOPA Breaks The Internet from Fight for the Future on Vimeo.

The article got up to 738 comments and they locked it from anymore comments.

The comment system on the BBC website is token and pointless and here are the reasons why :

1: every comment is censored by a paid human being for political correctness and language, (A total profligate waste of license money) since the comments after this process can never be said to represent free opinion, or allow for any negativity or criticism toward the beeb, it is automatically a pointless system !

In contrast to a ‘were all adults’ approach ie a completely free self moderated system.(all they need is a disclaimer of liability ?) after all if idiots want to chase theyre tail getting upset by comments on a website allow them to, but at least they’ll get a realistic view of the full spectra of opinion of the public ? whereas as the beebs approach has always been to sanitise public opinion to some absurd politically correct fascist liberal agenda > which is in no way democratic.

2: Very few articles do they allow the public any feedback on.

3: They select favourite comments to be “editors picks” giving them prime viewing, a highly subjective secondary form of censorship, which invalidates any worth in most other non picked comments in general.

4: They close comments on an article after a short while(in this case after 739 comments), and do not then add your comment to the article, even if you submitted your comment a large time before they close it for comments, yet before your comment has been through the censoring process. So your comment is then presumably just discarded, making bothering to attempt to comment even more pointless, as your words will most often be wasted.

5: They may well wimfully discard your comment and not inform you or send you a copy of the comment you made thereby throwing the energy involved in its creation away.

Now the point to gain from this is that some people comment on websites because they’re actually desperate for democracy, ie the idea their voice or opinion might make some difference, because lets face it democracy in britain equates to a single popularity contest being held once every four years for a different set of over-priviliged powerful idiots wearing different colour ties to come in and fuckup the country in their own special way. Basically commenting on websites is pointless, the website doesn’t want your feedback, they present your feedback on the site purely to give you the illusory token sense that you have some influence on them so that you feel good about your role as sponge in the push media. do not delude yourself any good comes form commenting on a website. Basically all the media, corporations and governments desperately truly fear the idea of true democracy. Because they presume people are too thick to be allowed an opinion.

THE CORPORATION THAT IS THE BBC IS AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN A PROPAGANDA VEHICLE FOR THE GOVERNMENT, and government itself is now in turn no more than a puppet for international business and corporate interest : learn this …

here is the comment I sent to the beeb roughly from memory, after all they lost my comment in the ether or censored it out of existence :
——————————————————————–
wow you are allowing comments again on the site ! wow thanks beeb !
so I get to have a say in the push media ?
I guess shareholders will have as much success of reigning in executive pay, as cameron did reigning in the immigration figures, ie a laughably pathetic inability to make any difference …
——————————————————————–

There is no correlation between the extent of people’s pay and their talents, that’s the definition of overpaid, when corporations waste money on people, unnecessarily, because they are the people who are deciding whose being paid what. the excuse of competitivity is being given. If cameron wants to control the excesses of the wealth class, all he needs to do is implement taxation that hammers the multiple house owner or property speculator class, basically bar buy to let mortgages beyond a single property, as that will affect all those people who are filthy wealthy. And that will redress the property inequality that is truly at the heart of the inequality and division that is killing UK culture.

I spoke to soon with the “I get to have a say”, my comment did not appear on this article, so if you want your view to appear on the internet copy your comment before posting it, run your own blog like I do and paste it to that, no one will read it mind and you will need akismet (spam comment blocker) for your blog to be even partially functional, but at least its there for posterity, because lets face it you can’t trust any corporation not to censor you out of existence or trash your comment with impunity, whilst simultaneously fawningly market at you, that they care and are desperate to let you have “Your Say” !

aide ? to

Mike Hancock MP age … 65

according to the telegraph :

“Katia Zatuliveter, 26, had affairs with Mike Hancock, a member of the defence select committee, and with a Dutch diplomat, a German Nato official and a UN worker.”

hmm that’s one way to stay in the country sleep with a 65 year old politician . . . . and a whole collection of older powerful burocrats.

“Miss Zatuliveter, who is being represented by a media handler and is expected to sign an exclusive deal to sell her story, said: “I feel fine. I am very happy, incredible relief. My parents are ecstatic.”

yes im sure they are ecstatic about who theyre daughter has been sleeping with ? all quotes referenced from these two articles :

Read more:
and here

wow shes such a moral human being ? Katia It’s so grim having to climb that greasy corrupt morally bankrupt political pole, but I guess your prepared to.

she said of the older men >

“She also appreciated their “humour, sophistication and kindliness,” the panel said. A personal diary included “excruciating detail” about her attempts to ensnare men and revealed she was an “immature, calculating, emotional and self-centred young woman”.”

the truth will out …

Great another useless contribution to the people that we allow to stay resident in this overly liberal culture.

MP Hancock – you sir are a truly predictable 65 year old man > GROW UP > and stop having women 39 years your junior who work for you ? and concentrate on the job at hand that portsmouth needs you to get on with !

“They said Mike Hancock, the Lib Dem MP for Portsmouth South, who appeared to mix with glamorous Russian and Ukrainian women and was supportive of the Russian government “would have been of long-standing interest to one or more Russian intelligence agencies.”
This liberal certainly does like immigration, especially when it get him access to young female russian ones to play around with, Mike . . . . christ you make politics look grimey. hopegully you can climb back into obscurity.

Christ and my day has been disturbed by the furtive goings on between a 65 year old liberal idiot and a needy for fathering insecure political sugardaddy pole climber, god why do I now feel the need to vomit and a general hatred for the continuingly corrupted behaviour of the 60′s generation ?

Her sister and brother-in-law, with whom she lived in Bradford, did not accept her relationship with Mr Hancock but the panel said: “However odd it might seem, she fell for him.”

“Miss Zatuliveter said afterwards that she was “very happy” with the decision and her parents were “ecstatic.” Her tearful sister, Polina, who lives in Chorley, Lancashire, rushed from the court room to ring them when the judgment came through.”

and Polina her sister of course magically by chance just happens as well to be living in the good old UK, because the UK border is effectively non existent ! and half run by naturalised immigrants allot of the time ? bloody bullshit this country is degenerating into, and this story evidence of it.

This is the thin end of a wide wedge to erode this culture from the inside out. Obviously native culture is limited in in Brent ? fireworks manufacturers are up for it, because they can sell more fireworks all year round, if we foster this foreign cultural festivals funded by taxpayers its an endless thing every group will want money spent on every religious observance and cultural trifle . Fundamentally bonfire night is the night for fireworks in this culture. Im beginning to hate people who seem only to want to join our culture for the improved living standards, and do not embrace this culture, and then want to thrust their culture in the faces of the english native, as far as im concerned you want to live in an indian way ? then please remain and live in the origin country of said culture. do not come here to the already fragile english culture and try and overrun it, by setting up little ghetto states within my culture, this is going to create trouble sooner or later regardless of being force fed/marketed an endless diet of multicultural propaganda by governments, councils and international media.

Human beings are natively tribal, and this government has forced english culture into a defensive mode with the endless mass immigrational era, which effectively abuses the section of people who are the struggling english native. And thats a global problem for most small nations, apart from the usa which is, in its current form a culture founded on immigration.

and current immigration figures being record in number, after promises to reduce them by a weak government are just the icing on the cake of this situation, the native has never been asking for mass immigration, only governments and business’s desire it economically, and sooner or later you have to choose between culture and money, I choose my native culture before money because I dont have any stake in either the money, business or property game, meaning that overt population pressure in this isle is not beneficial for me, all it means is more competition for the limited resources in this isle of decent home, quality job, school, health etc.

The united states of america is one country divided into states, and europe should not attempt to emualate that model, as really the philosophical idea of a states of the europe, is totally different its about taking tons of different countrys with seperate and independent national identity’s and trying to force them willing or not into one country, fundamentally impractical, and bound to lead to huge trouble, and civil unrest. And fundamentally the way every government of europe has attempted to copy everything america espouses or beleives in, has been obscene to observe.

Though of course europe declares any state dropping out of the european project must face the threat of the possibility of civil unrest according to the pro europeans politicians’s in brussels. to be honest this grand facist ideological superstates of europe thing is beginning to stink of rank ego in my opinion. Its not far from there to one world government, which will basically enable the boot to be firmly be planted in the face of humanity forever. Resist people … peace is stable and limitedly porous and controlled borders people, always has been always will be.

People are tribal they like their national identitys, and this is something europe fears.

keeping the original framework/bones of the building is just a joke, regardless of it’s infamous negative iconic history the building should be demolished, it was built as rabbit hutches for poor people without examining the space a human being needs to live in to feel civilised, and new dwellings created within that framework will create uncivilised lives. Knock the crap down and stop pandering to the ego’s of aging modernist architects who failed culture and are attempting to immortalise for the sake of their egos the cheaply produced crap they knocked out which is sadly the legacy of their shitty careers.

The problem with building anything better today, is that all architecture students are converted into modernist perverts before they’re allowed to practice or interact with the world. The disease is passed from one contaminated mind to another, Architects and designers today have no solidarity with the public, who put up with their disasters, their in the pay of developers, they get their over priced percentage based project profit, theyre masters have one interest money and profit, design is secondary to acheiving those first two perogatives, architects and designers can afford to waste their time deciding which italian / german taps will complement their stone surfaces in their modernist detatched dream house, whilst they employ a million foriegn student trainee’s to satisfy their other dream of engineering a culture of foreign loving internationalist roll necked sweatered ego’s. Who roam around europe working out the solution to rich peoples whims, whilst building ever decreasing in size dwellings, in euro industro park toy town housing schlock in cad programs for the commoners to live in, and the rules fundamentally, lead to crowding more people into less space ! thats not design its a human disaster ? without much hope or end in sight. Whats the ratio of detatched family homes being built over the years ? compared to say blocks of flats however tweely disguised, a declining one I would suggest. And notice how whenever any complaint is levelled about this, the excuse is always being given of cost ? AS though money is the prime perogative of all things, being fiscally prudent is one thing but non tangible money should never dictate the rate of human development or design evolution, because expensive material use is one thing, but better ideas dont necessarily take more time to think up than bad ones, and therefore should not cost more? Notice the only people who benefit from the extortionate rise in property values are developers and those property speculators with multiple homes already on the market. Screw these people, may the rot in human social isolation we allocate for those who demonstrate low moral responsibility towards their fellow brethren so as to line their own pockets with money all the better.

I guess the corporates and the EU have got your balls in a vice cameron ? perhaps the border agency is as we suspect innefective ? or cameron is weak on changing the UK’s seemingly entrenched ideology of mass immigration ? whichever way 239,000 more people arrived in the UK than left in 2010 :(

Cameron you want it down at the 10,000′s then cap both EU and external to EU immigration to those levels, screw business’s needs and the EU you should be representing the native individual voters not business desires or the EU’s requirements. Business would have us all replaced by the cheapest labour globally if it could get away with it, business doesnt give a shit for nor will ever effectively protect something a subtle as national identity or people culture. And the EU cuntocracy main agenda is to dissolve national sovereignty, identity, culture wherever it finds it, unless of course it has hokey tourist exploitable value. The thing the EU fails to understand America is one country divided into states, Europe is a collection of countrys being forceably driven to the idea of being one country by stealth, the only way for the EU to truly exist is to wipe out national identity something the people unless propagandised to death will never tolerate. The EU should have remained the EEC a trading block and no more. The open border EU policy was insane I something I never voted for and will always despise.

we really need statistics to count the number of of foreign students leaving the UK after their courses finish as its over 100,000 a year being educated here. I suggest capping that at 100,000 for the moment and reducing the cap each year by those student that dont leave.

Meaning since 1936 it’s become 12.5 times more expensive for a person to buy a family home in britain ! not including the doubling of that initial price cost by the now essential bank mortgage required to be loaned today in order to buy it, in others words by the time you paid off that £400,000 today you would have paid back roughly £800,000. meaning that multiplier could be as much as 25 times more expensive ? since your not buying outright ? obviously with deposit a bit less ?

No wonder young people are dis-enfranchised by the I’m alright house owning property speculating set ! they’ve benefited from a 12.5 times property increase in relative terms.

When an asylum seeker in this capital is given a family home paid for by housing benefit they are equivalently stealing in value the equivalent of winning the lottery in london for a poor person who doesn’t use the benefits system ? such is the value of a family home in london, and this wanker governement keeps dictating that all these foreign fuckers must somehow be housed at whatever expense, because of bullshit human rights law ? nobody has the rights to live in a £700,000 pound house off benefits ? at the tax expense of the native non claiming poor … its insane, houses are worth too much in relative terms to be giving houses away in london like this > God I hate what this country has become. And the government wonder why there is a growing distance between the moneyed powered housing set in government, and the young self reliant poor of today, who seek the standard of their forebears, home and family.