In this tragic murder the two victims were locals according to the ‘bbc’s’ video report, sahin and gol are both turkish surnames, local in this sense means that Mr Gol described as a “Turkish National” (no doubt one not destined for a less tax diminishing “turkish national prison” due to his human rights being infringed ?) who couldn’t speak english recently arrived in marriage to the daughter of mrs Sahin. This is really from a nationality perpsective, some recently naturalised turkish people murdered by a non naturalised turkish person, this use of the word “locals” by the bbc is the typical liberalist apologetic falling over themselves to deny the concept on british nativity claptrap, by proclaiming that all people living in britain with permanent right to remain are somehow as “native english” as native can possibly mean ? this is offensive to my sense of nationailty ? Holding a british passport may make you british in a technical sense, but it does necessarily make you british in a cultural sense, wherever Mr Gol comes from culturally, he obviously considers it ok to murder your wife and her mother.
sadly used in a commercial but somehow it survives it.
Like the binary base or foundation of the digital world, Are not all things in the real or psychological realm safely represented … by a queer alphabet of bundles of energy, whose masses attract, repel, disrupt, expand, contract and whose spin can unwind energy on and off each other, or further increase speed of spin or slow each other down, so as to attain or lose a meta kind of mass, so as to effect and interact within the greater space and all those bodies contained their in it, and within this space are all things that can be said to exist in any scientifically determinable sense occur.
And these energys at some scales, whos possible permutations of interactions so vast and incalculable, though pictures Continue reading
In my humanist opinion its now time to stand up and say … all religion is a medieval divisive irrellevance in the world today, im perfectly happy that sexual rights issues are causing religious fracturing, as religion has had its fair turn at destroying the unity of this culture with over the top belief, in happy clappy multi-culturalism, as christians by their doctrine have to beleive in a church open to all, ahead of any sense of native cultural unity or identity. All things provide some benefits including religion, whose legacy of music and architecture cannot be denied, regardless of the suffering involved in its creation.
Religions now apparent fracturing, is compensation against churches that have survived in recent times by acting as communitys centre for mainly foreign peoples, who have been indoctrinated abroad by morally dubious missionary work, only to then move to live in this country and zombie like maintain ailing religious attendance and activity in this culture by taking over churches and using them as a place for masonic like, self serving ethnic minority community activity, and ostricising the non attending native even further in the process, sadly it is the traditonal branches of christianity in this country that are being subsumed by this fracturing, and the other branches of religion, islam etc that are cohesively on the rise, this distresses me greatly for a country who historical roots of religion stem from celtic/christian origins. But this is the price christian religion will have to pay for having meddled and messed with native peoples the world over, whether in the uk or elsewhere.
If you like action films with bruce willis in, please … move along … move along, there is nothing for you to read here.
Please bear in mind this review is not made with reference to the first two films in the trilogy and that having seen the third i will now go back and fully view the others, as this film makes me curious as to perhaps the ill appreciated merit of the first two.
Robinson in Ruins ?
for me it was a a cross between a visual complete culpepers herbal, combined with a new form of visual psycho-geography, densely researched and interlinked, the visual Continue reading
top 10 unanswered questions : there is nothing unanswered about them I thought we’d all conquered these or was it just me ?
1. What is the meaning of life ?
Firstly there isn’t an individual and overriding meaning to life, except perhaps Secondarily to understand that loving or attempting to love other people as a human being, is a worthwhile activity whilst living, rather than living alone or not believing in other people, as living alone isn’t what life as a human being is for, some people unfortunately do spend there life alone and does not mean we should pity or chastise them, as they can also make great contributions, but that there life might have been richer for them if they had shared it. Thirdly we should balance the comprehension of this shared existence endeavour, with an equal measure of attempting to enhance and advance the understanding and definition of humanitys answer to the very question that caused these answers in the first place, ie one of lifes purposes is to endeavour to discover its meaning. Fourthly whilst operating the last three points we should attempt to comprehend were meant to try and enjoy the first three endeavours whilst were at it, and finally and Fifthly fear nothing life throws at us, both success and failure are two sides of the same coin, and the foundation of someone elses success is supported, quantified, measured and thereby dependently exists only with reference to someone elses failure , and again failure is at its least a meritable sign of trying, that is all comprehensibly washed away by Sixthly simultaneously holding the thought that nothing really matters in the end.
2. Is there a God ?
No there is not a GOD in any traditional religious sense, all known knowledge points to god if existent in any form, being incomprehensible from a human perspective. It would be a wonder to imagine that if there were such a thing as god, that it could make itself understood to us, in our present state of existence. So if you were to comprehend god, it would probably not be as yourself currently, therefore if one cannot comprehend god in ones current state of being from the perspective of this human existence, then god for us in this reality, or even as ourselves in another reality does not comprehendably exist, in a way that we can point to with personal comprehension.
Further more to this point this personality and collection thoughts we call ourselves, from which our mental perspective appears to eminate from, is not something we brought in with us as a finished fixed item to our current existence, it is something that has taken a lifetime to cultivate and grow which we now feel attached too in age, and has evolved been created in and belongs to our current existence ? and as such if we move through death to another state of existence why should we expect this mental bundle weve cultivated for the use of being here ? to come with us ? we didn’t arrive with it ? lets say for arguments sake we did take it with us, would you expect the next phase of existence to be some alternate “looking in” type existence with your current aged tired human mentality overshadowing this new phase of existence ? because the mentality you have cultivated has been evolved for this reality and as such might probably only be usefull afterwards if it was used to “look in” to the reality it came from ? I personally am not sure by the end of my life how many more years my mentality could evolve for, without serious distortion , unless there was some magic modifications done to rejuvinate only the parts that could be altered without changing it from being me ? therefore it is unlikely in an alternate existence we would be ourselves as we know ourselves.
To some extent I guess this is where some say the faith aspect comes in, but i see no reason, for an entity such as that which is provably the cause of this existence and ourselves, to require any demonstrations of faith from human beings in anyway. As it has laid all the evidence before us we could possibly need, and as such faith is of no consequence either way, for we cannot step outside of the existence which is possibly the best evidence of this god something, therefore if we are in or are part of the only humanly possibly perceivable part of god, we need not have faith as we can clearly see by what is here, that whatever it maybe, it is to our best comprehension existent, thereby if it is existent, it requires no faith with which to believe in it ?
Perhaps upon death there is some subtle shift to our being that makes other meta views as yet unseen possible but I still doubt we would see this as ourselves, for the existence/god dilemna does prove one fact, existence in its most reduced model often leads to a proof of something beyond the scientific, for ‘nothing existing’ would be the logical and obvious state, and this not being the case, certainly implies something is here, and that which is, did not assume the form of this easiest state(I myself find the true comprehension of that easiest state nothing : the most terrifying thing) this being the case means that at the core of existence , the tools of human logic will not serve us to understand the sum of everything, therefore as there will always remain, and in my opinion thankfully so, an unconquerable indivisible stubborn element we will never comprehend, this element in its humorous sense maybe thought of as the emotional magic some may call god, and I find it nice to think that we in some way, are directly connected to that magic indivisible thing.
3. Do blondes have more fun?
erm who cares ? I was a blonde child when young and I had some fun, but im sure some kids of other hair colour had as much fun if not more than me. answer : no.
4. What is the best diet ?
a balanced one that sustains and enhances your health ? well thats the german sense of it, but into that mix can be placed the pleasures of taste, such that it is balanced more than just nutritionally, as eating well has yet to be proven to sustain your life indefinately, as such it is futile to eat purely from a health perspective, as part of the eating experience, stems from what pleasure maybe gained from it as an experience, and it is finding this balance between health and pleasure to play out over your whole life and tongue, that makes it a “balanced diet”.
5. Is there anybody out there?
In the psychological sense, yes see the answer to question one, sometimes we may feel that no true contact can be made between human beings and that we, though ignorant of it are somehow actually alone, but in reality you can give other people more meaning to their own existence when you interact with them. and if you affect them that means they must be there. if this question is an allusion to other life outside of this earth, the scale of existence itself probably puts this at an equal probability of your own existence, and since you exist … the answer to this is yes, the problem with this answer is that although it is yes, this other life maybe at such a distance that the current interpretation of physics can find no safe human way/sensible method of meeting up, and even if we did it might be to meet a planet of plants or electrical entity’s, but thats what makes planning such a trip fun, the endless are we they’re yet ? for 19 millenia (see this article), only to be followed probably by not much amusement when we get there to shake hands either with an algae or our own humanity itself already setup nicely, since during our journey a series of increasingly advanced craft overtook each other to arrive at the destination before us and ruined the place before we got there ? though admittedly there is the chance for an exotic encounter beyond imagining, which makes it worth the pursuit.
6. Who is the most famous person in the world ?
This is not a worthy question for an english man
7. What is love ?
Its a true, but often temporarily and rarely found belief that hope and security and home for the psyche/soul validly rests in other people and maybe trustfully placed in they’re care reciprocally, rather than just oneself, and discovering through bidirectional evidential feedback that this can be true, is what may pass for love. This may obviously be accompanied with intense emotional feelings, as we rarely experience something so needed and so valid, letting these emotions overwhelm the psyche may prove detrimental to the love, some amplify their feelings and use them up and unconsciously seek its failure through too much testing, but a low calm emberous burn lasts the longest, and love can fill a life if it is played with balance and tunefully.
8. What is the secret to happiness ?
Seeing children grow from 2- 6 … the answers to questions are generally a presumption or an opinion.
9. Did Tony Soprano die ?
This a disgusting question, to be resident on this list. But evidence if any were needed of how cultures humour has degraded to a very low ebb, and that criminality is perceived as some form of suitable entertainment for the bored masses, who need to grow some more and spend their time fruitfully, it is one thing to waste ones own time, it is another thing to turn that waste of time into a pointless question for others to waste even more of human existence upon, not that the entity resolved from question 2 cares if we waste our time with such questions ? but we as humans should be listening to our higher human nature, which more importantly cares if we do, unless we too greatly and lazily comprehend the sixth point in question 1.
10. How long will I live ?
The length of time in which you live is an unknown variable, there are many unseen random ways of dying suddenly, which though unlikely overrule the sense of debate as regards any attempt to predict ones own death. More importantly, just rest assured that living can only done in the present, so make sure you make use of it. Plan like your leaving an empire to someone in a hundred years but live like you’ll die tomorrow or maybe next week sometime ? wow its amazing what tosh philosophy we can come up with at a push, but hey. answering questions with homespun philosophys is easy, living life well is another issue, so concentrate on that rather than questions like “How long will I live”
Now that we solved these 10, I suggest you get back to concentrating on doing something to enhance life in the present.
I beleive in the voice of the quiet man
pretty much most of that which he outputs, emerges as a condign and warming tableau …… cough
i love the way he refuses to dumb down his vocabulary, I agree … screw the illiterate, you cant learn new words unless someone is shouting them at you from the front of a classroom, and you have a marginal fear driving you to an increased vocabulary.
I learnt condign :) … go dig out the definition lazy
His sophisticated rants would fly high above and appear so abstruse to the subjects he targets, that he could probably let rip in their presence and they would still feel a great deal of uncertainty, about interpreting his meaning.
long may he haunt our screens with documentarys only a minority of the population will enjoy.
here is a human being existant in the world somewhere, apologys if this is you, and you dont like the photo, ill take it down if you request, but I think this lady is illustrating an expression of mine by accident which applys to us all.
The expression …
“We learn to love the monsters we become”