the guy was warned … tased and then shot six times, have the american police not heard of wounding someone ? set the dog on you had on him ? hit him with a baton ? shoot him in the thigh ? at least, get him down and cuff the guy and get him off to hospital to recover until his psychological derangement has shifted to more normal pattern when in prison. I suppose this is the true measure 300 million people, whats the loss of one public threatening spade wielding nut ? he was once somebodys son.

effectively they will equate to :

individual corporate vested interest removing entire sites from the internet for individual comments or content placed by users on those websites will basically lead and equate to, total corporate censoring of the entire internet for their own interests.

PROTECT IP / SOPA Breaks The Internet from Fight for the Future on Vimeo.

The article got up to 738 comments and they locked it from anymore comments.

The comment system on the BBC website is token and pointless and here are the reasons why :

1: every comment is censored by a paid human being for political correctness and language, (A total profligate waste of license money) since the comments after this process can never be said to represent free opinion, or allow for any negativity or criticism toward the beeb, it is automatically a pointless system !

In contrast to a ‘were all adults’ approach ie a completely free self moderated system.(all they need is a disclaimer of liability ?) after all if idiots want to chase theyre tail getting upset by comments on a website allow them to, but at least they’ll get a realistic view of the full spectra of opinion of the public ? whereas as the beebs approach has always been to sanitise public opinion to some absurd politically correct fascist liberal agenda > which is in no way democratic.

2: Very few articles do they allow the public any feedback on.

3: They select favourite comments to be “editors picks” giving them prime viewing, a highly subjective secondary form of censorship, which invalidates any worth in most other non picked comments in general.

4: They close comments on an article after a short while(in this case after 739 comments), and do not then add your comment to the article, even if you submitted your comment a large time before they close it for comments, yet before your comment has been through the censoring process. So your comment is then presumably just discarded, making bothering to attempt to comment even more pointless, as your words will most often be wasted.

5: They may well wimfully discard your comment and not inform you or send you a copy of the comment you made thereby throwing the energy involved in its creation away.

Now the point to gain from this is that some people comment on websites because they’re actually desperate for democracy, ie the idea their voice or opinion might make some difference, because lets face it democracy in britain equates to a single popularity contest being held once every four years for a different set of over-priviliged powerful idiots wearing different colour ties to come in and fuckup the country in their own special way. Basically commenting on websites is pointless, the website doesn’t want your feedback, they present your feedback on the site purely to give you the illusory token sense that you have some influence on them so that you feel good about your role as sponge in the push media. do not delude yourself any good comes form commenting on a website. Basically all the media, corporations and governments desperately truly fear the idea of true democracy. Because they presume people are too thick to be allowed an opinion.

THE CORPORATION THAT IS THE BBC IS AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN A PROPAGANDA VEHICLE FOR THE GOVERNMENT, and government itself is now in turn no more than a puppet for international business and corporate interest : learn this …

here is the comment I sent to the beeb roughly from memory, after all they lost my comment in the ether or censored it out of existence :
——————————————————————–
wow you are allowing comments again on the site ! wow thanks beeb !
so I get to have a say in the push media ?
I guess shareholders will have as much success of reigning in executive pay, as cameron did reigning in the immigration figures, ie a laughably pathetic inability to make any difference …
——————————————————————–

There is no correlation between the extent of people’s pay and their talents, that’s the definition of overpaid, when corporations waste money on people, unnecessarily, because they are the people who are deciding whose being paid what. the excuse of competitivity is being given. If cameron wants to control the excesses of the wealth class, all he needs to do is implement taxation that hammers the multiple house owner or property speculator class, basically bar buy to let mortgages beyond a single property, as that will affect all those people who are filthy wealthy. And that will redress the property inequality that is truly at the heart of the inequality and division that is killing UK culture.

I spoke to soon with the “I get to have a say”, my comment did not appear on this article, so if you want your view to appear on the internet copy your comment before posting it, run your own blog like I do and paste it to that, no one will read it mind and you will need akismet (spam comment blocker) for your blog to be even partially functional, but at least its there for posterity, because lets face it you can’t trust any corporation not to censor you out of existence or trash your comment with impunity, whilst simultaneously fawningly market at you, that they care and are desperate to let you have “Your Say” !

aide ? to

Mike Hancock MP age … 65

according to the telegraph :

“Katia Zatuliveter, 26, had affairs with Mike Hancock, a member of the defence select committee, and with a Dutch diplomat, a German Nato official and a UN worker.”

hmm that’s one way to stay in the country sleep with a 65 year old politician . . . . and a whole collection of older powerful burocrats.

“Miss Zatuliveter, who is being represented by a media handler and is expected to sign an exclusive deal to sell her story, said: “I feel fine. I am very happy, incredible relief. My parents are ecstatic.”

yes im sure they are ecstatic about who theyre daughter has been sleeping with ? all quotes referenced from these two articles :

Read more:
and here

wow shes such a moral human being ? Katia It’s so grim having to climb that greasy corrupt morally bankrupt political pole, but I guess your prepared to.

she said of the older men >

“She also appreciated their “humour, sophistication and kindliness,” the panel said. A personal diary included “excruciating detail” about her attempts to ensnare men and revealed she was an “immature, calculating, emotional and self-centred young woman”.”

the truth will out …

Great another useless contribution to the people that we allow to stay resident in this overly liberal culture.

MP Hancock – you sir are a truly predictable 65 year old man > GROW UP > and stop having women 39 years your junior who work for you ? and concentrate on the job at hand that portsmouth needs you to get on with !

“They said Mike Hancock, the Lib Dem MP for Portsmouth South, who appeared to mix with glamorous Russian and Ukrainian women and was supportive of the Russian government “would have been of long-standing interest to one or more Russian intelligence agencies.”
This liberal certainly does like immigration, especially when it get him access to young female russian ones to play around with, Mike . . . . christ you make politics look grimey. hopegully you can climb back into obscurity.

Christ and my day has been disturbed by the furtive goings on between a 65 year old liberal idiot and a needy for fathering insecure political sugardaddy pole climber, god why do I now feel the need to vomit and a general hatred for the continuingly corrupted behaviour of the 60′s generation ?

Her sister and brother-in-law, with whom she lived in Bradford, did not accept her relationship with Mr Hancock but the panel said: “However odd it might seem, she fell for him.”

“Miss Zatuliveter said afterwards that she was “very happy” with the decision and her parents were “ecstatic.” Her tearful sister, Polina, who lives in Chorley, Lancashire, rushed from the court room to ring them when the judgment came through.”

and Polina her sister of course magically by chance just happens as well to be living in the good old UK, because the UK border is effectively non existent ! and half run by naturalised immigrants allot of the time ? bloody bullshit this country is degenerating into, and this story evidence of it.

The united states of america is one country divided into states, and europe should not attempt to emualate that model, as really the philosophical idea of a states of the europe, is totally different its about taking tons of different countrys with seperate and independent national identity’s and trying to force them willing or not into one country, fundamentally impractical, and bound to lead to huge trouble, and civil unrest. And fundamentally the way every government of europe has attempted to copy everything america espouses or beleives in, has been obscene to observe.

Though of course europe declares any state dropping out of the european project must face the threat of the possibility of civil unrest according to the pro europeans politicians’s in brussels. to be honest this grand facist ideological superstates of europe thing is beginning to stink of rank ego in my opinion. Its not far from there to one world government, which will basically enable the boot to be firmly be planted in the face of humanity forever. Resist people … peace is stable and limitedly porous and controlled borders people, always has been always will be.

People are tribal they like their national identitys, and this is something europe fears.

keeping the original framework/bones of the building is just a joke, regardless of it’s infamous negative iconic history the building should be demolished, it was built as rabbit hutches for poor people without examining the space a human being needs to live in to feel civilised, and new dwellings created within that framework will create uncivilised lives. Knock the crap down and stop pandering to the ego’s of aging modernist architects who failed culture and are attempting to immortalise for the sake of their egos the cheaply produced crap they knocked out which is sadly the legacy of their shitty careers.

The problem with building anything better today, is that all architecture students are converted into modernist perverts before they’re allowed to practice or interact with the world. The disease is passed from one contaminated mind to another, Architects and designers today have no solidarity with the public, who put up with their disasters, their in the pay of developers, they get their over priced percentage based project profit, theyre masters have one interest money and profit, design is secondary to acheiving those first two perogatives, architects and designers can afford to waste their time deciding which italian / german taps will complement their stone surfaces in their modernist detatched dream house, whilst they employ a million foriegn student trainee’s to satisfy their other dream of engineering a culture of foreign loving internationalist roll necked sweatered ego’s. Who roam around europe working out the solution to rich peoples whims, whilst building ever decreasing in size dwellings, in euro industro park toy town housing schlock in cad programs for the commoners to live in, and the rules fundamentally, lead to crowding more people into less space ! thats not design its a human disaster ? without much hope or end in sight. Whats the ratio of detatched family homes being built over the years ? compared to say blocks of flats however tweely disguised, a declining one I would suggest. And notice how whenever any complaint is levelled about this, the excuse is always being given of cost ? AS though money is the prime perogative of all things, being fiscally prudent is one thing but non tangible money should never dictate the rate of human development or design evolution, because expensive material use is one thing, but better ideas dont necessarily take more time to think up than bad ones, and therefore should not cost more? Notice the only people who benefit from the extortionate rise in property values are developers and those property speculators with multiple homes already on the market. Screw these people, may the rot in human social isolation we allocate for those who demonstrate low moral responsibility towards their fellow brethren so as to line their own pockets with money all the better.

The thing that irritated me greatly about the program was the title used and the content bait and switch relative to it, “National Treasure Live” first of all the Jamaican content wasn’t live ? Secondly populational cultural uk diversity representation, could have been said to be fulfilled by Lenny henry presence on screen itself regardless of the Jamaican content, but then to go on and represent that the Jamaican contribution to british war effort in the second world war within the context of the program was to imply this Jamaicans alliance was a “national treasure” to us all ? this may well be Lenny Henry’s view im sure, and im sure you failed to bring the polish contribution in equal weight or other displaced allies operating out of the UK at that time ? who were not doubt also defending in that process, theyre own cultures ! regardless of the meritorious actions of the Jamaican people or other allies during the second world war and their contribution as a country still within empire control, “it seemed way too much like some form of propaganda to me” ie we should all be thankful of Jamaican immigration to the mother country ? was the net implication of the least we owed the ex RAF Jamaican pensioner living in this country ? truthfully a program about Jamaica’s assistance is not what I would be classing as a “national treasure” maybe that’s just my personal opinion as a native ? surely their contribution to the defeat of classic fascism should be a “Jamaican National Treasure” maybe ? Otherwise it would be to imply, they had nothing themselves to gain or lose from not aiding us or our loss in the war ! except perhaps the inevitable loss, in being part of a greater fascist nazi german empire ? and Jamaicans perception within nazi ideology ? for if england fell then her empire would have been forfeit to germany ? and the nazi’s would have got round to the Caribbean soon enough.

I understand in the current climate and recent events, you perceive that your standard spiel of multiculturalism is the only solution and should be shouted even louder down the populations throat, instead of thinking about the further espousement of the philosophy of multiculturalism, perhaps you should promote and find those elements that unify our culture for all people within it, and reverse the trend to draw segregational multicultural lines within it, after all the groups representation game, just look headless and pointless almost impossible to fairly implement.

As a person belonging to the one minority group that is not specifically represented properly in britain by lobbying/pressure/charity organisations or positively discriminational law ie the “historical british native” is something this culture has yet to recognise the existence of, without condemning it, as a non-existent concept from an intellectual perspective ? both in the media and in politics, to the extent of british nativity almost being perceived as a racist and negative prejudicial concept ? or in fact logically non existent compared to say norman descent, just because the non invading populational groups represented in britain, celts etc had their oral tradition stamped out and the written culture did not exist in a form that has survived well into recent history, does not mean this populational group weren’t very important or can be said, not to exist today from a cultural perspective, perhaps we still have too great a legacy today of those with representational power in todays culture, being descendant from the invasional classes ? in the effect of this non representation of this idea of british nativity ?

I also despised the twee section you had in the program, to “educate” a rather deliberately dimly selected informed and patronisingly regional caricature, that his surname, shock of shocks is probably descendant from the norman “invasion” of 1066, perhaps in these times sexistly not adding any weight to the validity of interbreeding and his possible maternal line, versus the patriarchal lineage, this also seemed to be an attempt to highlight he was some sort of immigrant himself ? with its proximity to the previous Jamaican section, feeling like a crude allusion to : ie ‘you who perceive yourself as british, are in fact nought more than a norman immigrant from times past ?’ without really portraying in fact the unifying nature of the interceding 900 years of passing time in that equation between the two forms of immigration ? within this program about “National Treasures” ? of course only subconsciously, not clearly illustrating for the viewers both romano and norman britain, were in fact the created through “invasion” and not open door immigration ! An important and subtle difference meaning that natives lost their lives in an often “tribally segregated” british culture of fragile alliances (perhaps to be perceived as multicultural ?) and thereby fractured and offering a futile defence, against often much more organised and unified european powers, and the “normans” weren’t french civility they were “normans > Norse Men > men of the North” ! ie vikings who a hundred years earlier prior to 1066 had been ceded normandy by the french as part of a peace treaty to resolve continuing viking incursions ? so what seems to be represented by the program, is perhaps only in the tv version of history, does it take just 100 years for viking barbarian norsemen warlords to be defined as civilised french invaders by the amplification of the false written history of the victor ?! Those were invasions, and not “multiculturalism in action” nor should it be portrayed so by the media ? there is a great deal of difference between a door being unguarded and left open (multiculturalism) and a door being battered down (invasion) as that would be-little the cultural sacrifice of the poorly documented people who attempted to defend this culture from invasion by laying down their lives in defence of it, even if history tends not, to write or represent the story of the “marketed as illiterate” vanquished, who by the way would always remain part of the breeding culture regardless of invasion.

The cultural representation of britain should never attempt, to segregate us into lots of disparate groups, the history of war throughout the world portrays this folly, the purpose of the “British” broadcasting corporation within its output in the majority, which will inevitably function as some form of propaganda in its delivery whether desired or not, should at least attempt to unify the population under the banner/idea of being “british” which regardless of current philosophy’s is a large part of the titular name of the organisation itself. Through this inevitable propaganda you will have to make, rather than the segregational multiculturalist representational idea you’ve been subconsciously pumping at us for 40 years in the visual imagery you present, without any attempt to actually comprehend exactly how tribal people are in nature in the first place, multiculturalism im sure looked good at its philosophical outset, from the perspective of people actually heterozygously mingling, though im sure the powerful internationally fluent and minded wealthy brits who implemented this philosophical idea and were by money independent of its results, were probably unaware how the lower and poorer classes who have a little stake in such philosophical beliefs, and must pay the consequences of immigration in terms of competition, cling quite deeply to their cultural identity and unity as they dont own much else or have a stake much other cultural capital, and certainly have money to compensate for the loss of it or retain their own well being separate form its impact.

The populational culture we experience today has mainly been descendant in a recognisable way from the last 200-300 years of history, and prior to the present days 70 year long immigrational agenda, from quite a cohesive unified populational body of people, yes theyre has always been some form of immigration, but the current era of mass immigration numbers wise, can only be represented in a strictly truthful sense exceptional novel and without precedent, excluding the definition of “900 year old historical invasions” as some form of immigration ? The population without invasion or internal squabbling was unified and rightfully so under a banner of britishness that “sense of unity” helped to defend this isle from all incomers for a very long period of recent history without any invasion. And as a person with long standing Welsh heritage who knows what the word “Welsh” actually means and whose chapel ancestors helped to break the dominance of English overlords in Wales, I still understand the necessity and usefulness of a single bordered island nation having no war like tribal tendencies and unnecessary divisions within it. and creating a sense of unity under a single banner. The current ethos, segregational version of multiculturalism and the “european project” ((code for dilute all cultural and national identity in the vain attempt to prevent fascism) seems to be doing the opposite of its intention ?) these things the BBC has consciously or not, been promoting through representation in a specifically positive light for the last 40 years, do little to add to that sense of unity or common bond of cultural identity of the “british” population, or your preferential description those people s/minority/community’s from wherever, who live within the confines of this isle ? The majority of the last 50 years of media has been spent in the attempted enforcement and idolisation of everything foreign, including the liberal agenda of importing people to this country as a solution to global poverty, which in fact betrays the ignorance and refusal of a “certain class” to except the shrinkage of britain in an empirical sense, the extreme ego of ammicability offered by one class at the expense of another, towards all people’s foreign, the BBC’s love of everything not british is in fact a hangover from BBC empire propaganda days, and such is only moderated, when it comes to global power conflicts in which the bbc denigrate such foreign people s under the auspices of media manipulative government led propaganda.

whichever the output needs to be more intelligent and representative of the truth, and properly independent ie not taking direct instruction from the Israeli state as regards broadcast images relating to operation cast lead in 2008 for example. And obviously the output of the BBC needs to be unifying of british culture, rather than toadying to some artificially enshrined positive discriminational, deliberately dilutionist segregational multicultural agenda.

or if not … we need to start perceiving the native people’s of this isle from a historical perspective as just another minority group that needs legislated protection through law, the same as all the others represented by such laws, as currently I feel the british population is currently perceived as not to actually exist in any tangible sense of the word ? ie the bedrock is somehow invisible by a presumption the current legislation somehow represents it, whereas in fact it does no such thing, since all laws and protections should apply to all within the boundaries of this country. And those that are specific on the basis of race or cultural origin are in their true meaning, in fact in law negative against those not mentioned in or represented by them.

The Middle to upper class have always been this way, favouritising foreign people who kiss their ass better and show them deference who they themselves wont have to compete with, and imported people are often so much more obliging in this matter, and agreeing with one, all lumley has done is add to the fiscally imprudent debt pile this country seems to now permanently sit upon, whilst shitting on struggling natives of this isle even further, and helping to further dilute this country beyond all cultural recognition from a people capital perspective, just so that she can soothe some supposed ancient familial debt she feels toward her twat imperialist anticendents, and preen her own vain sense of self morality, afforded at others expense so as to boost the image of her self ego. Now admiteadly the ghurka’s are probably such a small section of the immigrational problem they could probably be looked over, and also to a large extent we have chosen them as hired thugs from a historical military perspective, though to be honest in revenge of Joanna I’d love to AXE the ghurka regiment compeltely, but in reality the most sickening thing is that our supposed democratic choice should not be defrauded by that small section of forceful personalitys who work within the media set or in this case just Joanna herself ? deciding for us … the majority what occurs in this country from a cultural perspective, what our immigration policy is going to be etc ! and thats why it stinks. It also needs to be remembered that the immigration of the individual is the tip of the iceberg in this respect, as the dependants and associated family that comes with that means its a bleeding edge of immigration that will grow, and that the quantity that will take advantage is probably much underestimated.

8000 soldiers x associated family members ? Nepalese average family size is roughly 5.8 plus the infirm elderly relatives means a total of what 7 additional people to the soldier making 8 in total ? this could mean this immigration will alone come in at around a total of 64,000 nepalese ? and they roughly on everage claim £600-700 benefits a month ? which sounds a bit low on the basis that housing benefit alone would yield more than that for family homes of that size, so Joanna is personally responsible for immigrating 64,000 nepalese people into britain ? and adding £6,720,000 a year to our tax bill ? those figures are crude and could well be above this, but just grasp for a moment the idea as to how much non democratic power, her single i’m a well loved TV personality dictator vote has wielded to manipulate our culture identity as a whole ?

Immigration in general

Every immigrant regardless of who they are or where they come from or even how nice they are, is from an already struggling persons perspective just more people to compete against and further segregate and fuckup an already crowded divided island nation, just more competiton for those natives on the edge of survival as it is. Competition in this case is not the beneifical supermarket kind, its the kind that leads to an increasement in incivility in the nature of people in this culture generally by more selfish personalities. Maybe the comfortable middle and upper classes and the horrifically liberal overpaid media set haven’t felt the weight of competition of these imported peoples as of yet in their own private versions of existence in britain, but there has in fact been natives directly or indirectly passed from existence in this land without a taste of the happiness reward and opportunity and richness of existence or family that their forebears suffered to provide them, due to this aforementioned extra competition from people who do not necessarily believe in or have the burden of carrying the same inherited value set and whose segregated ‘community’s’ and ‘welfare groups’ are effectively nothing more than self serving masonic lodges. Also the opportunitys and help for the struggling that does exist, is instead very often being directly offered to foriegners endlessly for no valid reason in britain. Joanna Lumley does not wish or care to know the natives of her own isle, she is helping out of existence by her supposed philanthropy to foreigners, she is and remains a devisive and irritating person, who does not understand the class from which native islanders sense of national family might descend, for often those of the upper classes and those who aspire to it, do not subscribe to that sense of familial national identity in order to better serve themselves, she is descendant from such a class and the endless rain of shit they have been projecting over the years on any native person under them who doesnt agree with their world view.

Lumley

Lumley probably thinks shes from a lower to middle class military imperialist family, but the lower class today are such well propogandised morons they cant even see how subtlely theyre being fucked over by their own culture, propogandised to beleive in no native nationality by the media, which at its base level painted as racist by default, so theyre not even allowed a sense of national community without being classed as criminal, wrong in some way, the middle to upper class all the while forgetting that all the poor often to have to culturally cling onto of any worth to them is in fact their ‘national identity’ effectively their tribal identity, but no these struggling poor peoples are whose whose communitys are subsumed and over-run by the foriegn peoples, whose childrens learning and youth must be spent amongst the foreign, whose understanding of their native values must be formed and permanently altered by their close association with imported peoples, whose values may well be radically different, their destiny is irrevocably altered by a class above them, who though are the implementers a policy of immigration do not suffer the consequences of it themselves, secondarily this has created a sense of nuclearity with these native populations who feel under seige, meaning they identify with those in the harsh circumstances around them and the values these groups subscribe to, often denigrate subconsciosly the idea of education because good education belongs to the side of class divide theyre not in, on thier side of the line they have but sport and alchohol the boob tube, trashy materialism and entertainments and a wasted selfish life of cheap and short term gratification theyve been propogandised to beleive in as theyre culture from the start by a corrupt media giving them the trash they think will sell more media, the circumstance they find themselves in will often leave with a very flexible view of the law and a very inflexible of escape from their own situation.

All the while the deeply wealth seeking imported people, class believe-ing and social climbing, strongly middle to upper class aspiring immigrants, can leap over them to larger familys and cambrdge or oxford places for the heavily pushed second generation, since they often come from cultures in which they beleive in the class system, as often some form of caste system has been brutally apparent in their origin culture, and loving and respecting those selfish, ‘self preservation centric’ private wealth accruing values, and fully inhabiting and climbing into that middle to upper class mentality, wishing to exceed their native neighbour on the material track of life in this country and all that our imported form of pure materialism, now represents access to, which now appears to be everything of any worth including the most vital, a decent education, since the implementation of school league tables has further segregated culture, and this american form of utter monetary based social division is projected as a healthy system ? there is nothing healthy in this system at all.

I wish her and her 60′s foreign loving generation unhappiness and a shorter life, so we can get back to some people who actually believe in the people of this country rather than fostering those whose actions lead to its further and apparently endless dilution by the overt worshipping of all peoples and things foreign the 60′s framework seem to set up, for she has too royally sucked of the teet of existence provided by media fame, and its ego swelling, financial rewarding, class segregating milk.